Pages

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

BREAKING NEWS: Medals to mark the 1st year of Pope Francis' pontificate

The official medallion marking the first year of Pope Francis’ pontificate was presented here at the Vatican today.


Obverse of the Medal
(Francis, Supreme Pontiff, 1st Year)


Reverse of the Medal
(The scene recalling the call of Matthew, the basis for the pope's motto
Vidit ergo Iesus publicanum, et quia miserando atque eligendo vidit, ait illi, ‘Sequere me
In English is translated as "Jesus, therefore, saw the publican, and because he saw by having mercy and by choosing, He said to him, ‘Follow me’”)


Will these be locally produced?

I hope so.

We have great metal workers here in the country who can copy this.

Nice souvenir, don't you think?



Tuesday, October 8, 2013

Jubilee of Eucharistic Miracle of Orvieto


Did you know that this was declared by the former pope?




Rome, Italy, Oct 7, 2013 / 06:49 am (CNA/EWTN News).- In light of the jubilee instituted by Benedict XVI in honor of the Eucharistic miracle in Orvieto, Italy, the number of pilgrims coming to the area has increased, deepening the faith of those who come.  [ On that note, is your faith about the Real Presence deepened by your experience of Communion in the Hand?  Ask those who receive through this method.]

It just makes you thankful that you can come somewhere where these things have happened that just reiterate the faith. It’s so real, it’s so tangible,” Jenna Schaffer of San Francisco, Calif., told CNA Oct. 6.

While he was Pope, Benedict XVI dedicated the years 2013 and 2014 as an Extraordinary Eucharistic Jubilee. The event celebrates the 750th Anniversary of the Bolsena Miracle of 1263, in which the Host began to bleed in the hands of the priest during the prayer of consecration.

Schaffer, who visited Orvieto with her mother and a close family friend, shared that she grew up Catholic, but has become especially close to God in recent years, and that being in the cathedral for her was “an honor.”

“It’s a great honor,” she emphasized, “to be able to hear and see what all of these people believe in and see it come true.”

The miracle occurred in 1263 when a German priest, Fr. Peter of Prague, stopped in Bolsena, Italy during a pilgrimage to Rome. The priest is described as having been pious, but found it difficult to believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.

During his stay, the priest was saying Mass in the Church of St. Christina in Bolsena, and had just finished the words of consecration when blood began to seep from the Host onto the altar and corporal, a special linen used during Mass in order to catch any fragments of the host which might fall.

Fr. Peter immediately journeyed to Orvieto where Pope Urban VI was residing at the time, and informed the pontiff of what had just occurred.

After hearing the priest’s account, the pontiff absolved the priest for his disbelief and had the host and blood-stained corporal brought to the Cathedral in Orvieto where they are still venerated today, and instituted the feast of “Corpus Christi” a year later.  [The events related here are depicted in paintings in the chapel of the Corporal in the Orvieto Cathedral.  I have seen it for myself.]

Upon seeing the corporal in the Cathedral, Schaffer said it was “almost like trying to grasp the concept of God himself.”

“It’s a lot to take in, and it gives you a lot to reflect on, and to sit there and see where it happened, see the dedication to it,” she said. “It’s just hard to grasp that concept that this happened here. It’s just an honor.”

It really enriched my faith.

Gianlucca Piazza, who works at the Orvieto cathedral as a part of their security personnel, told CNA in an Oct. 6 interview that although there are many people who visit the cathedral for “artistic purposes,” most of the pilgrims come “for religious purposes.”

In context of the Jubilee called by Benedict XVI, Piazza noted that the number of pilgrims coming to the area has increased, stating that the miracle is “especially important” for Catholics.

According to Piazza, the Orvieto Cathedral still functions as a Church, with daily Mass during the week and four Masses on Sunday for those who wish to attend.


***

A fitting post number 3,001 don't you think?  Especially after that post about Robby Okol taking home the Blessed Sacrament gathered some cobwebs from the priests who are supposed to protect the Blessed Sacrament.

Do you think they cared about Church regulations about bringing the Blessed Sacrament to a building not approved by the Church?  By a person not even a cleric?

I had a gut feeling about this and I was right.  They'd sweep it under the rug and act as it nothing bad happened.

Surprised?

Don't be.

This is the Archdiocese of Manila we are talking about.

We do not need to go to Orvieto to witness this miracle.  It happens at every single Mass.

Oh did I say that this Mass celebrated by the priest does not resemble the Mass we have right now, like in SM Megamall and ABS-CBN?




It looks like this.



Go and spend time before the Blessed Sacrament, either in the Adoration Chapel or in front of the Tabernacle.

Whichever you choose, He is there!

Just go!


***

One unknown fact about the cathedral is that it already was a popular site for pilgrimage due to the fact that the it houses the relics of St. Pietro Parenzo martyred by the Cathar heretics in 1199.  Many favors are granted through this saint's intercession.

On hindsight, I remember the late Ernie Baron of DZMM and ABS-CBN's Knowledge Power saying that the liturgical revolution after Vatican II took out "fictitious saints" from the Church's Liturgical Calendar.  If he were alive today, he would've probably said that there is no saint named Pietro Parenzo and that his name most likely was taken off the calendar by the Vatican.

Some knowledge no?

God have mercy on his soul.


GULP Alert Update: What did they do after seeing the post?

Remember this?


Of course, our dear friends Robby Okol read about this and so did the two priests mentioned in the blog, Frs. Jek and Gener.

Everybody in the Archdiocese of Manila knows who those two priests are.

How did they react?

According to our deep penetrating GULP agents,  DEADMA.

Yup.  The two priests couldn't care less.  Why you ask?  Either they fully agreed with what Okol did and gave their permission to the staff of Fr. Diwa to take home the Blessed Sacrament for his own private exposition and adoration, or these two priests are just playing it by ear until someone files a petition against them either in the Archdiocese or in the Holy See.

As for Robby.

What is he doing?

Cleaning up his friends list in Facebook.

So that is now the protocol when you are caught doing some illegal and possible sacrilegious thing to the Blessed Sacrament.

Play possum and Unfriending.

They must have this guy as their adviser.



PS:  Which has the higher probability for the Blessed Sacrament to be snatched away like this for "private adoration"?

                a.  Communion in the Mouth
                b.  Communion in the Hand


Don't strain your brain.  You might look like Patrick Starr.



WARNING TO THE PUBLIC: Robin Aguilar, Fake Dominican

Why do we have these altar servers having a delusion of grandeur?!

Mr. Robin Aguilar, altar server of the Cathedral of St. Andrew, Diocese of Parañaque, posing here with his own cathedra, and his picture as a "Dominican" and the letter from the Dominican Province stating that he is not a Dominican.

I even heard reports of him going around asking for money.  I even once saw a photo of him with Cardinal Tagle in his Dominican habit.





This document is available on the official blog of the Dominican Family in the Philippines.

In this day and age of the Internet, you would think you can fool people with this shenanigan???





Saturday, October 5, 2013

St. Francis was not a liturgist, but....

He knows his liturgy, and in obedience to Holy Mother Church, he followed them, faithfully, obediently.

He did not earn any degree from the great "masters" of liturgy like Bugnini and Chupungco....but he followed what was in the liturgical books.

If he were alive today, he would be accused by Dean Laum, as a "rigid:, "rubricist", "clinging to a lost past", "Ratzingerian", "rad trad".

But what did he instruct his little brothers?

Let us try to look at it, courtesy of the great Fr. Z.

Epistola ad custodes
To all the custodians of the Friars Minor to whom this letter shall come, Brother Francis, your servant and little one in the Lord God, greetings with new signs of heaven and earth which are great and most excellent before God and are considered least of all by many religious and by other men.
I beg you more than if it were a question of myself that, when it is becoming and you will deem it convenient, you humbly beseech the clerics to venerate above all the most holy Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ and His Holy Name and written words which sanctify the body. They ought to hold the chalices, corporals, ornaments of the altar, and all that pertain to the Sacrifice as precious. And if the most holy Body of the Lord is left very poorly in any place, let It be moved by them to a precious place, according to the command of the Church and let It be carried with great veneration and administered to others with discretion. [Like Robby Okol and that EMHC who gave 5 hosts to a sick child in my upcoming blog post...]  The Names also and written words of the Lord, In whatever unclean place they may be found, let them be collected, and then they must be put in a proper place. And in every time you preach,admonish the people about penance and that no one can be saved except he that receives the most holy Body and Blood of the Lord. [Do they still do that today?  Rarely.  Don't be surprised why we as a Catholic nation, have politicians who are so numbed they still think it is not a sin to lie, cheat and steal.  Right Sen. Drilon???] And whenever It is being sacrificed by the priest on the altar and It is being carried to any place, let all the people give praise, honor, and glory to the Lord God Living and True on their bended knees. [Do you even see your priest genuflect when they enter the church?  So why be surprised that people don't even do that today!] And let His praise be announced and preached to all peoples so that at every hour and when the bells are rung [You still have bells in your church or chapel?] praise and thanks shall always be given to the Almighty God by all the people through the whole earth.
And whoever of my brothers custodians shall receive this writing, let them copy it and keep it with them and cause it to be copied for the brothers who have the office of preaching [because not all priests then can preach, and they had to get permission to preach.  And with the kind of homilies we get every Sunday Mass, ugh!  You now know why there is a need for a preaching license.  By the way, Vatican II did that.  I mean the wrong interpretation of Vatican II.]  and the care of brothers, and let them preach all those things that are contained in this writing to the end: let them know they have the blessing of the Lord God and mine. And let these be for them true and holy obedience.  [Now it is dialogue first with the superior before obedience.  And if you can't get your whims, leave!  Yeah.  I know one.  BIG EGO.  It shows, physically.]

And let us see what the great liturgist Fr. Genaro Diwa is doing.




Yup.

Non metal chalice.

Superb!

What do the liturgical books say?

GIRM No. 328 clearly states: "Sacred vessels are to be made from precious metal." Liturgical law, however, allows the bishops' conference to propose other esteemed materials for use in sacred vessels.

Redemptionis Sacramentum
Chapter V - CERTAIN OTHER MATTERS CONCERNING THE EUCHARIST
3. Sacred Vessels
117. Sacred vessels for containing the Body and Blood of the Lord must be made in strict conformity with the norms of tradition and of the liturgical books. [cf. GIRM 327-333] The Bishops’ Conferences have the faculty to decide whether it is appropriate, once their decisions have been given the recognitio by the Apostolic See, for sacred vessels to be made of other solid materials as well. It is strictly required, however, that such materials be truly noble in the common estimation within a given region, [cf. GIRM 329,332] so that honour will be given to the Lord by their use, and all risk of diminishing the doctrine of the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharistic species in the eyes of the faithful will be avoided. Reprobated, therefore, is any practice of using for the celebration of Mass common vessels, or others lacking in quality, or devoid of all artistic merit or which are mere containers, as also other vessels made from glass, earthenware, clay, or other materials that break easily. This norm is to be applied even as regards metals and other materials that easily rust or deteriorate. [cf. GIRM 329,332; Inaestimabile donum, 16] 



Did the CBCP say anything about this?  Nah.

Is ceramic an esteemed material?  Nah.

"But TPC, it is what's in the heart that is important!"

Oh, right!  I guess the Wise Men who visited the Baby Jesus told Him and His parents that it's the thought that counts...

And oh, Christ also did not mind that precious perfume was poured on Him by the repentant woman which Judas Iscariot rebuked and wondered why the money spent on that was instead given to the poor.

Yeah.  They all do care for the poor that is why instead of spending money on precious vestments and vessels for the worship of God, we give it to the poor.

Yeah, as if I am not witness to the extravagance behind the...

Wonder why Pope Francis kept on insisting about the trappings of the "courtiers".  Now, I understand.  It was staring me right in my eyes...

And this is what you get from being a liturgical expert.

You get so numbed drowning in the trappings of your degree, you forget the most basic thing, OBEDIENCE.

And we all thought we had a liturgical expert in our midst.

No wonder you have such great differences between Manila and Cebu...

Even vocations wise.

It shows.  It really shows.



New sign to be installed at Catholic Churches in the Philippines???



So that priests would not use the lame excuse of "Purihin natin ang Panginoon!" or "Palakpakan natin ang Panginoon!" or "Praise the Lord" just to get the people to clap at their lousy and boring homilies, or find an excuse to cheer the poor girls who just danced at the singing of the Gloria.

Yeah, the oldies do that every Sunday at the Mass of Fr. Mario "Swswswswshhh" SOBREjuanite, SSP at Megamall.

And I guess this sign would just go on every time Mass is over.

Boy, are the people so happy that Mass is over they'd rather clap their hands rather than pray the Prayer to St. Michael the Archangel and leave the church in silence.

Anywho, has your parish even started praying the Prayer to St. Michael every end of the Mass?

I guess not!



Thursday, October 3, 2013

GULP Alert: WHY COMMUNION IN THE HAND MUST BE STOPPED!

This is a grave liturgical abuse!

In fact it is sacrilegious!

I'll let his status updates speak for themselves.

My bishop/priest friends who regularly read the blog would need to comment on this...badly!

For Non-English speakers, here is the gist...

1. He took home a consecrated host after being reminded of the two priest to take "Jesus home" using a white cloth presumably either a corporal or purificator.
2.  He kept it overnight at his home for his own vigil.
3.  No one knows what he did to Him afterwards.









Redemptionis Sacramentum states:
[132.] No one may carry the Most Holy Eucharist to his or her home, or to any other place contrary to the norm of law. It should also be borne in mind that removing or retaining the consecrated species for a sacrilegious purpose or casting them away are graviora delicta, the absolution of which is reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith

Code of Canon Law:
Can.  935 No one is permitted to keep the Eucharist on one’s person or to carry it around, unless pastoral necessity urges it and the prescripts of the diocesan bishop are observed.
Can. 1367 A person who throws away the consecrated species or takes or retains them for a sacrilegious purpose incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; moreover, a cleric can be punished with another penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state.

Did he take the Host for sacrilegious purposes?  We don't know.  But this we do.  HE TOOK HIM HOME!

This is against Church law as I have stated here and he must be made aware of what he has done.

I advise him to go see the Cardinal Archbishop of Manila, if he really lives within the territorial jurisdiction of the Archdiocese.

Whoever Fr. Jek and Fr. Gener are...you two are also in a lot of trouble!

And you, Fr. Diwa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is the perfect example why we need to STOP COMMUNION IN THE HAND!!!

It has created more problems and scandal for the Church!

If you are pastorally sensitive as you always put it in your documents Fr. Diwa, then in God's name, you are bound by the duties and responsibilities of the Sacrament of Holy Orders conferred upon you, to act against this sacrilege!

STOP COMMUNION IN THE HAND!





GULP Alert: Liturgical Circus Master Piero Marini to be appointed at CDW?

And I can hear Fr. Geny Diwa, Fr. Godwin Tatlonghari and Fr. Reginald Malicdem all giggling in anticipation...

Rumors have been swirling since June of this year and yet another news has come up that this rumor is not a wild one.  The master innovator, the circus master of inculturationism and the living breathing protege of suspected freemason Annibale Bugnini is being rumored for so many months now to be appointed as Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship.

He is the same man, an archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church, to openly support the civil union of same sex couples.  He is the same man who openly criticized Pope Benedict XVI's liturgical renewal, "the reform of the reform", "the hermenuetic of continuity.  He is openly hostile against Summorum Pontificum and all the traditional Latin Mass communities, yet he does not bat an eyelash when it comes to naked tribes people dancing in front of the pope during Mass.

Here is a blog post from the Catholic Herald.  Spot on conclusion!

But this time, I am really nervous. For if he [Pope Francis] really does appoint Archbishop Marini as prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship, it can mean only one thing: a radical rejection by Pope Francis of the pontificate of his predecessor, of one of the truly great popes of the last hundred years. It will mean a definitive return to the hermeneutic of rupture and discontinuity. That’s why I don’t believe it’s going to happen. But if it does…. Dear Heavens, what then?

If this truly happens, then God forbid it because I was not hoping to say this to my friends since I heard Bergoglio's name was announced.

 

Fr. Lombardi tries to "spin" it again.



From the Vatican's News website

***

During the question and answer session, significant attention was paid to the lengthy interview published in the Tuesday edition of the Italian daily La Repubblica. Fr. Lombardi SJ explained that the text, like that of the interview published recently in La Civiltà Cattolica and America magazine (among other Jesuit reviews of affairs around the world), represents a “conversational” or “colloquial” form of communication. “It is not,” he explained, “a magisterial document.”

***

Yeah, we all get it.  It's not magisterial.  Just as any president would say anything, unless written and passed through parliament, it is not legal.  Just as any priest or bishop can say anything non-magisterial but controversial, double-meaning that leads to more questions than answers.

Can you dear Fr. Lombardi, at least get a hold of a copy of the interview before it gets printed and at least get a more accurate translation and if even after the translation things are still not that clear, can you ask the Holy Father to rephrase it making it clearer?

Can you, please?



Wednesday, October 2, 2013

CDF chief is a party pooper!

The party of the liberals that is!  Ha!

From this.

***

The German Catholic News Agency interviewed the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig Müller, in Rome on 21 September, the day he was confirmed in office. Below is a verbatim translation of that interview.

.....

KNA: Can former liberation theologians who have been reprimanded (by Rome) now hope to be rehabilitated?

Archbishop Müller: (laughing) I myself haven't reprimanded any! Contrary to widespread popular opinion, the two instructions of 1984 and 1986 were not a big 'No' to liberation theology. They merely discussed certain aspects of it. Its most important representatives have developed their thinking in a positive way. One should be glad if tensions are not exacerbated and perpetuated. It is also the task of our Congregation to contribute towards reconciliation. [which is also the tone of Pope Francis'.  But what if the dissenters keep on dissenting?  What to do with them?  Well, the recent excommunication of Mr. Reynolds shows what Pope Francis will do.] There must be no rival camps in the Church. When occasionally there is a hardening of attitudes, we must overcome them and lead everyone back to the fundamentals of the faith.

KNA: Your Congregation is often seen as a censor's office for undesirable theologians, especially in Germany. After the Pope's most recent interview (in Civiltà Cattolica) one could get the impression that Pope Francis wanted to change that image.

Archbishop Müller: The image exists but it is incorrect. Of the 4,000 or so bishops and theologians appointed, you get perhaps ten cases where the nihil obstat (nothing stands in the way) cannot be given. Then, of course, there's a huge echo and the positive things we do to promote the faith go under. Thus the International Theological Commission and the Pontifical Biblical Commission, both of which are assigned to our Congregation, do great deal of development work. False teachings, however, must be rejected. Whether Jesus is the Son of God or was just a good person who paved the way for today's party-political social programmes is not immaterial. Healthy doctrine, the correct practice and eternal salvation belong inextricably together.

KNA: Up to now the Pope has not proclaimed any new doctrine. He obviously wants to set different priorities as far as the way the Church approaches people is concerned. Less dogmatically and less moralising and more pastorally, instead. Would you say that that is what is at the heart of his concern or how do you interpret what he has said?

Archbishop Müller: It's not as if other bishops or Pope Benedict had constantly spoken about abortion, sexual morals or euthanasia. And pastoral work is not a therapeutic game. It wants to serve people with the Word of God. That is why juxtaposing doctrinal and moral teaching against pastoral work is not in the mind of the inventor. The former is the source of the latter.  [You cannot do pastoral work without any basis from faithful doctrinal and moral theology!]

KNA: What does that mean?

Archbishop Müller: If Jesus Christ is not the Son of God who became Man, then he cannot be the Good Shepherd. Pope Francis has that special charism of being able to translate the Church's doctrine of the faith, which he adheres to unconditionally as he never tires of emphasising, into a personal encounter with people. [Most Catholics are not used to having a pope behave that way actually.] As Pope he behaves like a local pastor.

KNA: If I've understood Pope Francis correctly, then he wants national bishops' conferences to take on more responsibility - also in controversial issues, and Roman authorities to function in a more subsidiary way as service providers. Will this affect the CDF in your opinion?

Archbishop Müller: The CDF is responsible for the whole world in the interests of the papal Magisterium. Bishops lead local Churches. The papal and the episcopal office are legitimised by divine law. That is something that bishops' conferences are not. [And that means you Fr. Diwa!  mind your own business!  You don't have any business telling a bishop what he needs to do in terms of liturgy in his own diocese!  And that means stop making those phone calls!  You are no bishop!  And you are certainly no pope!] They are work groups but do not have a competence to teach of their own over and above that of an individual bishop's mandate. So they are not a third authority between the Pope and bishops. I don't think, therefore, that we'll see a sort of federalist reform similar to that in the Federal Republic [of Germany] where key competences are relayed from the central state to the individual [German] states. That is not how the Church is constituted. According to the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, the Church consists in and of the local Churches.  [At least we have a correct interpretation here of Vatican II!  Hoorah!]

***

So worry bugs can breathe a sigh of relief after reading this from the prefect of the CDF.

So Hans Kung can now throw a hissy fit!  Goodbye synodal Church!  You can kiss the Episcopalian / Anglican model goodbye!

That was not how the Church was, is and will ever be!

It is Peter and the bishops.  Not Peter and the bishops of the Philippines.

That synodality was very rampant after Vatican II with each bishop's conference determining how each of the countries will worship, which universal Church feast will be celebrated in their country, and which pious practice like fasting and abstinence will be mandatory.

On the other hand, will this also mean that each bishop will do whatever he likes in his own diocese?

Remember, a bishop is shepherd of his flock, in his own diocese.  And, like Pope Francis, he is a son of the Church.  And like the pope, he should only teach what is in the Catechism.

But in terms of liturgy...

Uhm....




More questions than answers: About the new interview with the Pope

I am not going to write about it.

I'll let a priest who I really trust and had the pleasure of talking in more than one occasion explain the latest confusion the interview brought.

Visit the great Fr. Z's blog for his comments and suggestions on how to understand the more controversial, getting to be a habit, off the cuff remarks of the Holy Father.

In the meantime, I'm listening to this.

Lovely song!


Tuesday, October 1, 2013

In the name of freedom...


And I guess some priests would even call this the primacy of conscience, no?

Read this disturbing article where a Swedish court allows public masturbation, with caveat though...as long as you are not directing "it" towards others!

So what's next?

Public sex since the two people doing it are not directing it towards other people?

This is what happens when we lose the sense of civility of what is sacred.

When what we care about is just our own rights!

What is happening to the world?

Pray and fast!

The message of our Lady of Fatima rings more importantly now more than ever!