- Thanks dear padre for letting me use your CAPS keys. :)
SMILE dude!
You're too serious, stop the hate will you?
I am not a secret SSPX.
Ha!
The blog of a group of Filipino Catholics and their frank commentary on anything that affects their lives as a citizen of the Philippines and as a Roman Catholics.
Friday, April 27, 2012
Sharing you my FB status update.
If I know what he posts on his wall even though I am not on his friends on FB and even the other guy he suspects I am, HOW COME I CAN READ HIS WALL POSTS?
- Thanks dear padre for letting me use your CAPS keys. :)
SMILE dude!
You're too serious, stop the hate will you?
I am not a secret SSPX.
Ha!
- Thanks dear padre for letting me use your CAPS keys. :)
SMILE dude!
You're too serious, stop the hate will you?
I am not a secret SSPX.
Ha!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sayang Sir TPC, if he had practiced more prudence in dealing with fellow Catholics, fellow defenders of the Faith, your blog and his could have joined forces in defending Catholicism in the country - one from enemies from within, the other from without. Kaso lang marami nang nangyari, I've been following both blogs since 2010. Sigh.
ReplyDeleteHi Sir,
ReplyDeleteI know whom you are referring and like yourself, I too don't agree the way he debated and he’s not acting like a man of God. In fact, I even engaged in debate with him several times. I am depending the position of the Society.
He has no charity and he was using all the bad words unworthy of a priest.
If you would permit, I just want to share with you my comments on his blog and the way he responded:
I used Anonymous.
Here’s also the link: http://thesplendorofthechurch.blogspot.com/2011/06/refuting-anonymous-sspx.html
REFUTING AN ANONYMOUS SSPX
COMMENT PART 1:
"JOHN XXIII AND JOHN PAUL THE GREAT ARE NOW BEATIFIED WHILE THE CORPSE OF LEFEBVRE AND THE SEDEVACANTIST LEADERS ARE ROTTING.
"THAT CHURCH OF SATAN ARE THE SCHISMATICS AND THE HERETICS. I THINK THE SSPX AND THE SEDEVACANTISTS FIT THAT DESCRIPTION.
THAT ONE MUST BE AN INSIDER IN THE DEMONIC COUNCIL OF HELL WHERE LEFEBVRE NOW SITS IN ETERNAL DAMNATION FOR DYING EXCOMMUNICATED."
YOU CERTAINLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT ARE YOU SAYING FR.ABE. KUNG MAGSALITA KA PARANG HINDI KA ISANG PARI O ALAGAD NG SIMBAHAN. WALA KANG PINAGKAIBA KAY ELISEO SORIANO. PAREHO KAYONG BASTOS MAGSALITA.
BAKIT HINDI MO SUNDIN ANG SABI NI SAN FRANCISCO ASSISI AND I QUOTE,
""Blessed is that religious who takes no pleasure and joy except in the most holy words and deeds of the Lord and with these leads people to the love of God in joy and gladness. Woe to that religious who delights in idle and frivolous words and with these provokes people to laughter."
I AM ALSO AGAINST SEDEVECANTISM BUT NOT WITH SSPX. SSPX IS NOT SEDEVACATIST.YOU ARE SAYING THAT SSPX AND ARCHBISHOP MARCEL LEFEBVRE WERE EXCOMMUNICATED.
You were not even updated regarding the decree of the Vatican nullifying the decree of SSPX excommunication issued from the Congregation for Bishops on January 21, 2009.
And may I ask, who are you to say that the good Archbishop now sits in eternal damnation? So you think yourself as God who can judge? Did Pope Benedict XVI tell that Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was in hell? Don't you think you are not sinning by your vain presumption and rash judgement?
Let me quote from Pope Benedict's own letter:
"So if the arduous task of working for faith, hope and love in the world is presently (and, in various ways, always) the Church’s real priority, then part of this is also made up of acts of reconciliation, small and not so small. That the quiet gesture of extending a hand gave rise to a huge uproar, and thus became exactly the opposite of a gesture of reconciliation, is a fact which we must accept. But I ask now: Was it, and is it, truly wrong in this case to meet half-way the brother who "has something against you" (cf. Mt 5:23ff.) and to seek reconciliation? Should not civil society also try to forestall forms of extremism and to incorporate their eventual adherents – to the extent possible – in the great currents shaping social life, and thus avoid their being segregated, with all its consequences? Can it be completely mistaken to work to break down obstinacy and narrowness, and to make space for what is positive and retrievable for the whole?"
CAN YOU ANSWER THAT QUESTIONS BY THE POPE?
My comments part II on the infamous Catholic priest blogger:
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said...
COMMENT PART 2:
Pope Benedict XVI continued in his letter and I quote,
"I myself saw, in the years after 1988, how the return of communities which had been separated from Rome changed their interior attitudes; I saw how returning to the bigger and broader Church enabled them to move beyond one-sided positions and broke down rigidity so that positive energies could emerge for the whole. Can we be totally indifferent about a community which has 491 priests, 215 seminarians, 6 seminaries, 88 schools, 2 university-level institutes, 117 religious brothers, 164 religious sisters and thousands of lay faithful? Should we casually let them drift farther from the Church? I think for example of the 491 priests. We cannot know how mixed their motives may be. All the same, I do not think that they would have chosen the priesthood if, alongside various distorted and unhealthy elements, they did not have a love for Christ and a desire to proclaim him and, with him, the living God. Can we simply exclude them, as representatives of a radical fringe, from our pursuit of reconciliation and unity? What would then become of them?"
If the Pope has such a great mercy and charity toward the SSPX, who are you not to do the same??
Whatever happened to charity in your speech? “Learn of me, because I am meek and humble of heart” says our Lord. [St. Mt. XI:19] Do you really think that there are no consequences to what you say on the internet? But I say unto you, that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment. [St.Mt XII:36]. Do you think that you are really helping anyone or converting souls by the use of bitter sarcasm and malicious words that are designed to wound rather than to edify? charge them before the Lord to avoid disputing about words, which does no good, but only ruins the hearers. [2 Tim:II:14]. Are you really proud of your words? Rejoicing that you have “won” the argument? He is proud, knowing nothing, but sick about questions and strifes of words; from which arise envies, contentions, blasphemies, evil suspicions. [1Tim:VI:4] But shun profane and vain babblings: for they grow much towards ungodliness. And their speech spreadeth like a canker... [2Tim:II:16,17]
Are you aware of the gravity of the sin of Detraction and Calumny?
You maybe right;But if you don’t have charity where does that leave you? St Paul tells us that if we speak with the tongues of men and angels and have not charity, we are become like sounding brass, like tinkling cymbals.[1Cor XIII:1] And right now the sound of brass and tinkling cymbal emanating from your blog is simply deafening.
Your blogs are totally worth giving time and energy.
ReplyDeleteLOS MEJORES frases para facebook