What does it do?
It actually gives you the permission from the Holy See to teach the subject of Sacred Liturgy in seminaries and pontifical colleges and universities, that is why it is a License.
So, in a way, it gives you the credibility to teach the subject, after all, not all those who graduated from Law school actually can be a lawyer. You need to pass the Bar. So only a Bar passer is credible. Same goes with the the one with a licentiate in Sacred Liturgy.
You'd see the SLL appended on their names, usually priests and some nuns would take this.
And so, what's up with this photo?
Yup, the priests were saying Mass. All properly dressed for the occasion. Yeah, I am being sarcastic.
So where is the SLL in all of these?
The old priest with white hair is.
Rector, vicar general and holder of a Licentiate in Sacred Liturgy saying Mass this way.
Don't ask the liturgical color of the day.
I think the theme of the day was:
"Rainbow Connection in a hotel room Mass."
If you have Catholic priests celebrating Mass this way, who needs the Iglesia ni Cristo to desecrate it?
Pitiful sight.
PS: He got his licentiate from San Anselmo in Rome. Ahhhh...No wonder. Birds of the same feather...have the same sized bird brains. Huh? That didn't make sense! Well, this picture doesn't too!
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
Monday, October 8, 2012
What text of the Our Father we MUST use!
And yet, the world-renowned liturgy expert, and you-know-who-he-is, kept on insisting to use the 1976 version.
BUT! BUT!
The 16th century version that the CBCP ordered to be used, in obedience to the new English translation of the Roman Missal, is the same version that Lutherans are using, the same translation used in the Book of Common Prayers!
"But TPC, what has this got to do with the Liturgy Expert?"
What you ask?
HE IS AN HONORARY LUTHERAN AND HE DOES NOT WANT THE "OUR FATHER" LUTHERANS ARE USING?!?!
And I thought he was for an ecumenical liturgy?!?!
Weird...
Just in case you forget:
BUT! BUT!
The 16th century version that the CBCP ordered to be used, in obedience to the new English translation of the Roman Missal, is the same version that Lutherans are using, the same translation used in the Book of Common Prayers!
"But TPC, what has this got to do with the Liturgy Expert?"
What you ask?
HE IS AN HONORARY LUTHERAN AND HE DOES NOT WANT THE "OUR FATHER" LUTHERANS ARE USING?!?!
And I thought he was for an ecumenical liturgy?!?!
Weird...
Just in case you forget:
Our Father, who art in Heaven, hallowed be Thy Name, Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not to temptation but deliver us from evil.
Labels:
chupungco,
liturgy,
New Roman Missal,
new translation,
pinoy bishop
Pope's butler is guilty....but!
He may get a pardon!
I sure hope that this also closes this scandal of leaks from the Vatican!
I sure hope that this also closes this scandal of leaks from the Vatican!
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Liturgy experts becoming Experts in Liturgical Abuse!
What the Holy Mass should look like
Vatican City, Oct 3, 2012 / 09:42 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Pope Benedict XVI has reminded Catholics that the liturgy belongs to Jesus Christ and his Church, and should not be changed according to individual whims. [Especially those who parade their diplomas in Liturgy! Ha! Benedict drives....SLAM DUNK! For the Win! Boom! Pak! Ouch!]
“It is not the individual – priest or layman – or the group that celebrates the liturgy, but it is primarily God’s action through the Church, which has its own history, its rich tradition and creativity,” the Pope said during his Oct. 3 general audience in Rome. [take that parish liturgical commission! Stay away Angry Manang!]
“This universality and fundamental openness, which is characteristic of the entire liturgy is one of the reasons why it cannot be created or amended by the individual community or by experts, but must be faithful to the forms of the universal Church,” he stated. [UNIVERSAL!!! Take that Inculturation!!!]
With over 20,000 pilgrims gathered in St. Peter’s Square, the Pope explained how the Church is made most visible in the liturgy where “God enters into our reality and we can meet him, we can touch him.” The liturgy is where “he comes to us, and we are enlightened by him.” [We do not come to Mass to meet the Powerpint priest aka Fr. Glenn...the modulated SM Megamall shopping dance-patron priest aka Fr. Mario....or......]
The primary importance of Jesus Christ within the liturgy has been a constant theme of Pope Benedict’s teaching during his seven-year pontificate. He has often expressed concern that bad teaching can lead some Catholics to view the liturgy “horizontally” as the creation of a parish or group in which the community celebrates itself. “The liturgy is not a kind of ‘self-manifestation’ of a community,” he told pilgrims. [Have you noticed how people treat the Mass today....as if it were just your ordinary thing? How people dressed up? Because they see it in their priests!!! Some even say Mass wearing slippers! And where do the laity go to to report this? NOWHERE! Except turn to GULP where these Liturgical Abusers get called out. CYBERCRIME THIS DUDE!!!]
Pope Benedict noted that when priests or parishioners reflect on how to make the liturgy “attractive, interesting and beautiful,” they can “risk forgetting the essential: That is the liturgy is celebrated for God and not for ourselves.” [Whether they admit it or not, these liturgical dancers are all on it for themselves. If they really want to praise God using their bodies....then they do it like King David in the Psalms!....he did it after the sacrifice in the Temple! And he did it while no one was watching. Let's see if these so called liturgical dancers would do it all for God without anyone watching or clapping at them. Ha!]
To help counter such erroneous concepts, Pope Benedict XVI’s papal liturgies are always celebrated with a prominent crucifix placed centrally upon the altar. [Only narcissistic priests don't want anything especially the image of the crucified Christ covering their well-Belofied face. Ha!]
The liturgy is God’s work and he is the subject, the Pope said, adding that this means when it comes to the liturgy we must “open ourselves to him and be guided by him and his body which is the Church.” [And you don't have to go to Malaybalay or Mendiola to learn that! Ha!]
“If the centrality of Christ does not emerge in the celebration, then it is not a Christian liturgy, totally dependent on the Lord and sustained by his creative presence,” he said. [When the priest's main attention is to draw everything towards him, then you know he is not doing God's work. As I have challenged Fr. Mario, will he still say Mass at Megamall if the Mass weren't televised? I guess NOT!]
“God acts through Christ, and we can only act through him and in him.”
This conviction must grow in the hearts and minds of Catholics each day because “the liturgy is not our, my, ‘action,’ but the action of God in us and with us.”
“Let us ask the Lord to learn every day to live the sacred liturgy, especially the Eucharistic celebration, praying in the ‘we’ of the Church, that directs its gaze not in on itself, but to God, and feeling part of the living Church of all places and of all time,” Pope Benedict said in conclusion.
***
We go to Mass for the Lord, to worship Him, to thank Him, to ask forgiveness to Him, to ask for His Graces....THAT'S IT!
We do not go to Mass to be entertained...
We do not go to Mass because of the priest, because one priest is boring while the other one is entertaining...
We do not go to Mass to have a fellowship!
We do not go to Mass to say "Hi", "Good morning!" or "Batiin mo ang katabi mo!". You do not need the Mass to do that!
We do not go to Mass to look at a powerpoint presentation of a priest trying hard to be Stephen Covey!
We do not go to Mass to listen to recycled jokes!
We do not go to Mass to be entertained!!!
***
What the EXPERTS or those educated by the EXPERTS at Mendiola and Bukidnon have done...
Vatican City, Oct 3, 2012 / 09:42 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Pope Benedict XVI has reminded Catholics that the liturgy belongs to Jesus Christ and his Church, and should not be changed according to individual whims. [Especially those who parade their diplomas in Liturgy! Ha! Benedict drives....SLAM DUNK! For the Win! Boom! Pak! Ouch!]
“It is not the individual – priest or layman – or the group that celebrates the liturgy, but it is primarily God’s action through the Church, which has its own history, its rich tradition and creativity,” the Pope said during his Oct. 3 general audience in Rome. [take that parish liturgical commission! Stay away Angry Manang!]
“This universality and fundamental openness, which is characteristic of the entire liturgy is one of the reasons why it cannot be created or amended by the individual community or by experts, but must be faithful to the forms of the universal Church,” he stated. [UNIVERSAL!!! Take that Inculturation!!!]
With over 20,000 pilgrims gathered in St. Peter’s Square, the Pope explained how the Church is made most visible in the liturgy where “God enters into our reality and we can meet him, we can touch him.” The liturgy is where “he comes to us, and we are enlightened by him.” [We do not come to Mass to meet the Powerpint priest aka Fr. Glenn...the modulated SM Megamall shopping dance-patron priest aka Fr. Mario....or......]
The primary importance of Jesus Christ within the liturgy has been a constant theme of Pope Benedict’s teaching during his seven-year pontificate. He has often expressed concern that bad teaching can lead some Catholics to view the liturgy “horizontally” as the creation of a parish or group in which the community celebrates itself. “The liturgy is not a kind of ‘self-manifestation’ of a community,” he told pilgrims. [Have you noticed how people treat the Mass today....as if it were just your ordinary thing? How people dressed up? Because they see it in their priests!!! Some even say Mass wearing slippers! And where do the laity go to to report this? NOWHERE! Except turn to GULP where these Liturgical Abusers get called out. CYBERCRIME THIS DUDE!!!]
Pope Benedict noted that when priests or parishioners reflect on how to make the liturgy “attractive, interesting and beautiful,” they can “risk forgetting the essential: That is the liturgy is celebrated for God and not for ourselves.” [Whether they admit it or not, these liturgical dancers are all on it for themselves. If they really want to praise God using their bodies....then they do it like King David in the Psalms!....he did it after the sacrifice in the Temple! And he did it while no one was watching. Let's see if these so called liturgical dancers would do it all for God without anyone watching or clapping at them. Ha!]
To help counter such erroneous concepts, Pope Benedict XVI’s papal liturgies are always celebrated with a prominent crucifix placed centrally upon the altar. [Only narcissistic priests don't want anything especially the image of the crucified Christ covering their well-Belofied face. Ha!]
The liturgy is God’s work and he is the subject, the Pope said, adding that this means when it comes to the liturgy we must “open ourselves to him and be guided by him and his body which is the Church.” [And you don't have to go to Malaybalay or Mendiola to learn that! Ha!]
“If the centrality of Christ does not emerge in the celebration, then it is not a Christian liturgy, totally dependent on the Lord and sustained by his creative presence,” he said. [When the priest's main attention is to draw everything towards him, then you know he is not doing God's work. As I have challenged Fr. Mario, will he still say Mass at Megamall if the Mass weren't televised? I guess NOT!]
“God acts through Christ, and we can only act through him and in him.”
This conviction must grow in the hearts and minds of Catholics each day because “the liturgy is not our, my, ‘action,’ but the action of God in us and with us.”
“Let us ask the Lord to learn every day to live the sacred liturgy, especially the Eucharistic celebration, praying in the ‘we’ of the Church, that directs its gaze not in on itself, but to God, and feeling part of the living Church of all places and of all time,” Pope Benedict said in conclusion.
***
We go to Mass for the Lord, to worship Him, to thank Him, to ask forgiveness to Him, to ask for His Graces....THAT'S IT!
We do not go to Mass to be entertained...
We do not go to Mass because of the priest, because one priest is boring while the other one is entertaining...
We do not go to Mass to have a fellowship!
We do not go to Mass to say "Hi", "Good morning!" or "Batiin mo ang katabi mo!". You do not need the Mass to do that!
We do not go to Mass to look at a powerpoint presentation of a priest trying hard to be Stephen Covey!
We do not go to Mass to listen to recycled jokes!
We do not go to Mass to be entertained!!!
"When we assist at the Mass we are not just individuals of the earth or solitary units, but living parts of a great spiritual order in which the Infinite penetrates and enfolds the finite, the Eternal breaks into the temporal, and the Spiritual clothes itself in the garments of materiality. Nothing more solemn exists on the face of God's earth than the awe-inspiring moment of Consecration; FOR THE MASS IS NOT A PRAYER, NOR A HYMN, NOR SOMETHING SAID – IT IS A DIVINE ACT WITH WHICH WE COME IN CONTACT AT A GIVEN MOMENT OF TIME."- Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen
***
What the EXPERTS or those educated by the EXPERTS at Mendiola and Bukidnon have done...
The Male Vestal Virgins???
The Mumbaki Censing Dance Troupe!
The "Sunday Dance Troupe" of Channel Mass. Look! There's Fr. Glenn!
The Swswswswshhhh Ballet Company...
The Trip to Jerusalem Mass of Euntes Zamboanga
The Excursion Mass of the Groovy Reverend BayWatch!
Yes, that is the Mass they want.
Yes! Because their Mass is all about THEM!
Not about HIM who is crucified!
***
PS: Here is the Vatican's prohibition against Liturgical Dance and other Creativity Nonsense.
Print a copy and give it to your parish priest!
And if you can find anything in the General Instruction for the Romal Missal, or in Redemptionis Sacramentum OOOOOR in any Vatican II documents about having these kinds of shenanigans at Mass that permits this... I DARE YOU!
***
PS: Here is the Vatican's prohibition against Liturgical Dance and other Creativity Nonsense.
Print a copy and give it to your parish priest!
And if you can find anything in the General Instruction for the Romal Missal, or in Redemptionis Sacramentum OOOOOR in any Vatican II documents about having these kinds of shenanigans at Mass that permits this... I DARE YOU!
Be Warned!: Another Fake!
is he the same guy who writes in the fake Facebook account of Archbishop Chito Tagle?
Did you read the terrible English?
Horrendous!
See why it has become my apostolate to call out guys who are not even seminarians who go around wearing a clerical collar?
Either you are a genuine one or you are going to con someone of their money!
Plaza Miranda Friday Tambay!
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Liberal West is worried of my favorite cardinal
Why, oh why?...
Just because he wears traditional vestments?
Ha!
***
VATICAN CITY (RNS) When some American Catholics worry that the hierarchy is tilting toward the Republican Party, or taking the church back to the 19th century (or earlier), they often point to Cardinal Raymond Burke as Exhibit A. [Anyone who is not the conventional or in this case, someone who would trifle their "right to be a brat" whining, expect the liberal Democrats to look someone from the Catholic Church....the conservatives that is. Forget, Cardinal Roger Mahony. He is a Democrat. Ha!]
That's understandable, because love him or loathe him -- and few are on the fence -- Burke's many pronouncements on politics and the culture wars have given both fans and critics plenty of ammunition for their respective views.
Back when he was archbishop of St. Louis in 2004, for instance, Burke touched off a fierce debate by declaring that Catholic politicians such as John Kerry who support abortion rights should be denied Communion. Voters who supported them were in grave peril too, he added. [Burke knows what he is talking about! He is a canon lawyer!]
Burke doubled down on those views after Pope Benedict XVI appointed him to a top Vatican job in 2008, saying that under President Obama the Democratic party "risks transforming itself definitively into a 'party of death'." [Isn't it?] In 2009, Burke fueled another controversy when he said that the late Sen. Edward Kennedy should have been denied a church funeral for his support of abortion rights and gay rights. [RIGHT!]
"They can't say anything about me that would surprise me," Burke said with a soft laugh when asked in a recent interview about the passionate reactions sparked by his public stands.
"To be honest with you, I'm the sort of person who would be very happy not to have to speak out. I'm not a person who by nature likes to do that. But I believe it's my obligation," [Do most of our priests and bishops know what those words mean? Or being politically correct or ecumenical to the point of being relative is more important nowadays, huh?] said Burke, who is always affable and remains accessible to the media. "It's a responsibility that's been given to me. I try to do it, though certainly not perfectly."
The 63-year-old prelate -- in his workaday attire of black cassock with red piping and a scarlet sash with matching skullcap -- was speaking in his gilded offices on the upper floors of the 16th century Palazzo della Cancelleria, one of the most famous Renaissance palaces in Rome that now houses the Catholic Church's highest court.
The Apostolic Signatura handles canon law cases from around the world, from marriage annulments to parish closings; since 2008 Burke has effectively served as the chief justice of the church's supreme court. It's a platform that he has used to great effect -- and to the consternation of his critics.
Indeed, when Burke was called to Rome after just four tumultuous years in St. Louis, many suggested that he was getting "kicked upstairs" in order to get him out of the U.S. spotlight. A case of "promuovere per rimuovere," as the Italians say -- to remove through promotion. [How I wish this happens to one guy! And he ends up in an obscure Vatican dicastery where he cannot be seen on Tv anymore. Try guessing. Ha!]
But if that was the plan, it hasn't worked out so well.
In his four years in Rome, Burke has continued to speak his mind -- he is a favorite on the conservative Catholic speaking circuit in the U.S. -- while also becoming a player in Vatican politics in ways that extend his influence well beyond the occasional rhetorical broadside.
Benedict elevated Burke to cardinal in 2010, giving him a vote in a conclave that would elect the pontiff's successor, [no mention that he can become pope too? Hmm...] and put him on the Congregation for Bishops, the Vatican body that vets candidates for bishops in the U.S. and around the world. [One name slipped his watch, though. Ugh!] That gives Burke a key role in shaping the hierarchy for years to come, which he seems to be doing.
Vatican observers saw Burke's hand in the 2011 promotion of Archbishop Charles Chaput, whose conservatism closely tracks Burke's, from Denver to Philadelphia. And they say Burke was key in Oakland Bishop Salvatore Cordileone's recent move to San Francisco. [Can we all say "Deo gratias!"?]
Blogger Rocco Palmo dubbed Cordileone's promotion the "Bombshell by the Bay" -- Cordileone is an outspoken conservative and leading supporter of California's Prop 8 banning gay marriage, and will now be archbishop of the nation's gay mecca. But he's also a longtime friend of Burke.
No wonder longtime Vaticanista Marco Tosatti anointed Burke as "the'great puppeteer' of American appointees" to the U.S. hierarchy. [If that is the kind of puppeteer, then heck I will be a puppet! Strap me up! Ha!]
Burke was also believed to be one of the instigators of the controversial Vatican crackdown on a major group of American nuns, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, who Rome viewed as straying too far from orthodoxy and spending too much time on social justice issues.
In the interview, the cardinal acknowledged that he was consulted about the LCWR takeover, but he argued that it was "logical" to seek his input given his long experience in the U.S. church. He also reiterated his view that the Vatican had every right to undertake the investigation, even as he stressed that he was not involved in carrying out the actual overhaul.
Burke said his opinion "is certainly heard" on a range of matters at the highest level of the Vatican, even if his views are not always followed. "I don't have any pretenses about being some powerful figure, no," he added. "But it is heard, and respectfully."
The cardinal also said that many American bishops naturally turn to him as "a friendly contact" in Rome who can advise them "on matters large and small," and that he tries to convey those views to his colleagues in the Vatican bureaucracy.
Yet whatever his success since coming to Rome, Burke's rise hasn't been without its stumbles.
Another of his U.S. proteges, Bishop Robert Finn of Missouri, was found guilty in September of covering up for a priest suspected of child abuse -- the first bishop ever convicted in the long history of the clergy abuse scandal. When asked to comment about Finn at a September meeting with journalists, Burke demurred. "It wouldn't be proper," he said.
Burke is also a leading advocate of a restoration of the church's older rites and traditions, like the Latin Mass, which he argues were heedlessly cast aside in the liberal "euphoria" after the reforms of the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s. [Liberal euphoria, love the term! Like Hippie Revolution! No wonder we had "Jesus Christ: Superstar". Aquarius!!!!]
But Burke has been celebrating so many old-style liturgies and donning the most ornate regalia -- long trains of watered silk, velvet gloves and elaborate brocades -- that several Vatican officials said he had been asked to "tone it down a bit." [Did they ask Archbishop Piero Marini to tone down his theatrical Masses during JP2's time? Nah. But when it is something traditional, expect the inculturated maniacs to throw a hissy fit.]
Whether he will is another matter.
"The vestments, everything, are part of a tradition," Burke says in his defense. "We need to understand that and not just discard it and say, well, it was all just an ugly accretion." [If anything old must be discarded......then away with those nutty old inculturated liturgists!! Ha! Cybercrime this dude!]
Burke also got into hot water in 2009 when he taped an interview for anti-abortion activist Randall Terry in which he chided his fellow bishops for not taking a harder line in denying Communion to pro-choice politicians or those who support gay marriage. Those bishops, he said, are "weakening the faith of everyone." [Saying like it is! Really love this cardinal! My predictions of him being a cardinal under Pope Benedict XVI were right, y'all!]
Burke later apologized, but he has continued to press fellow bishops to speak out as strongly as he does. "If the shepherd isn't obedient, the flock easily gives way to confusion and error," he said during a 2010 speech to an anti-abortion group.
For Burke, the risks are too high to remain on the sidelines. Obama's presidency and the advancement of issues like gay marriage and abortion rights have made it imperative for Catholic bishops to speak up, he says, though he realizes that the president is ahead in the polls and could well win. "I don't know what would happen if that would be the case," he said, shaking his head.
But he said he has been encouraged that a growing number of bishops appear to be joining the campaign for religious freedom that has targeted White House policies on contraception coverage, because he believes that Christians in the U.S. could well face direct governmental persecution for their beliefs.
"These are definitive moments and the stakes are as high as you can get," Burke says. "That really pleases me, that more bishops are speaking out on their own."
In the end, that kind of activism by the bishops he helps appoint may be Raymond Burke's true legacy.
***
Well, the critics of Cardinal Burke would certainly be against his fashion style....
Blessing people like this...
Modeling a hat like this....
Dressing up for Mass like this....
Creating new deacons and priests like this....
Hanging with such friends such as these...
and this... (gotta put them in, ha!)
And thinking like...(How deep a scar would this leave on a Mr. Constitutionalist's coconut?)
Ha! That was me talking.
They would protest if he does his job as a Catholic bishop. If he speaks only what the Church teaches, the liberals and Modernists would react.
BUT!
They would not react if they see...
The Precious Blood placed in a wine goblet and pitcher to look like Kool-Aid from our favorite GULP Liturgical Abuser, who thankfully is not archbishop of Los Angeles anymore, Roger Cardinal Mahony...
They would not react if the bishop is dressed up for and offers Mass like this...
or hangs out with guys like these...
Yes the dang Masons were acting like they were co-consecrating.
and happily called to the altar.....with a female EMHC masking as a priestess...Ha!
DO WE HEAR ANYONE OF THOSE LIBERALS REACTING?
Nah....
Silence means "Yes"
Just because he wears traditional vestments?
Ha!
***
VATICAN CITY (RNS) When some American Catholics worry that the hierarchy is tilting toward the Republican Party, or taking the church back to the 19th century (or earlier), they often point to Cardinal Raymond Burke as Exhibit A. [Anyone who is not the conventional or in this case, someone who would trifle their "right to be a brat" whining, expect the liberal Democrats to look someone from the Catholic Church....the conservatives that is. Forget, Cardinal Roger Mahony. He is a Democrat. Ha!]
That's understandable, because love him or loathe him -- and few are on the fence -- Burke's many pronouncements on politics and the culture wars have given both fans and critics plenty of ammunition for their respective views.
Back when he was archbishop of St. Louis in 2004, for instance, Burke touched off a fierce debate by declaring that Catholic politicians such as John Kerry who support abortion rights should be denied Communion. Voters who supported them were in grave peril too, he added. [Burke knows what he is talking about! He is a canon lawyer!]
Burke doubled down on those views after Pope Benedict XVI appointed him to a top Vatican job in 2008, saying that under President Obama the Democratic party "risks transforming itself definitively into a 'party of death'." [Isn't it?] In 2009, Burke fueled another controversy when he said that the late Sen. Edward Kennedy should have been denied a church funeral for his support of abortion rights and gay rights. [RIGHT!]
"They can't say anything about me that would surprise me," Burke said with a soft laugh when asked in a recent interview about the passionate reactions sparked by his public stands.
"To be honest with you, I'm the sort of person who would be very happy not to have to speak out. I'm not a person who by nature likes to do that. But I believe it's my obligation," [Do most of our priests and bishops know what those words mean? Or being politically correct or ecumenical to the point of being relative is more important nowadays, huh?] said Burke, who is always affable and remains accessible to the media. "It's a responsibility that's been given to me. I try to do it, though certainly not perfectly."
The 63-year-old prelate -- in his workaday attire of black cassock with red piping and a scarlet sash with matching skullcap -- was speaking in his gilded offices on the upper floors of the 16th century Palazzo della Cancelleria, one of the most famous Renaissance palaces in Rome that now houses the Catholic Church's highest court.
The Apostolic Signatura handles canon law cases from around the world, from marriage annulments to parish closings; since 2008 Burke has effectively served as the chief justice of the church's supreme court. It's a platform that he has used to great effect -- and to the consternation of his critics.
Indeed, when Burke was called to Rome after just four tumultuous years in St. Louis, many suggested that he was getting "kicked upstairs" in order to get him out of the U.S. spotlight. A case of "promuovere per rimuovere," as the Italians say -- to remove through promotion. [How I wish this happens to one guy! And he ends up in an obscure Vatican dicastery where he cannot be seen on Tv anymore. Try guessing. Ha!]
But if that was the plan, it hasn't worked out so well.
In his four years in Rome, Burke has continued to speak his mind -- he is a favorite on the conservative Catholic speaking circuit in the U.S. -- while also becoming a player in Vatican politics in ways that extend his influence well beyond the occasional rhetorical broadside.
Benedict elevated Burke to cardinal in 2010, giving him a vote in a conclave that would elect the pontiff's successor, [no mention that he can become pope too? Hmm...] and put him on the Congregation for Bishops, the Vatican body that vets candidates for bishops in the U.S. and around the world. [One name slipped his watch, though. Ugh!] That gives Burke a key role in shaping the hierarchy for years to come, which he seems to be doing.
Vatican observers saw Burke's hand in the 2011 promotion of Archbishop Charles Chaput, whose conservatism closely tracks Burke's, from Denver to Philadelphia. And they say Burke was key in Oakland Bishop Salvatore Cordileone's recent move to San Francisco. [Can we all say "Deo gratias!"?]
Blogger Rocco Palmo dubbed Cordileone's promotion the "Bombshell by the Bay" -- Cordileone is an outspoken conservative and leading supporter of California's Prop 8 banning gay marriage, and will now be archbishop of the nation's gay mecca. But he's also a longtime friend of Burke.
No wonder longtime Vaticanista Marco Tosatti anointed Burke as "the'great puppeteer' of American appointees" to the U.S. hierarchy. [If that is the kind of puppeteer, then heck I will be a puppet! Strap me up! Ha!]
Burke was also believed to be one of the instigators of the controversial Vatican crackdown on a major group of American nuns, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, who Rome viewed as straying too far from orthodoxy and spending too much time on social justice issues.
In the interview, the cardinal acknowledged that he was consulted about the LCWR takeover, but he argued that it was "logical" to seek his input given his long experience in the U.S. church. He also reiterated his view that the Vatican had every right to undertake the investigation, even as he stressed that he was not involved in carrying out the actual overhaul.
Burke said his opinion "is certainly heard" on a range of matters at the highest level of the Vatican, even if his views are not always followed. "I don't have any pretenses about being some powerful figure, no," he added. "But it is heard, and respectfully."
The cardinal also said that many American bishops naturally turn to him as "a friendly contact" in Rome who can advise them "on matters large and small," and that he tries to convey those views to his colleagues in the Vatican bureaucracy.
Yet whatever his success since coming to Rome, Burke's rise hasn't been without its stumbles.
Another of his U.S. proteges, Bishop Robert Finn of Missouri, was found guilty in September of covering up for a priest suspected of child abuse -- the first bishop ever convicted in the long history of the clergy abuse scandal. When asked to comment about Finn at a September meeting with journalists, Burke demurred. "It wouldn't be proper," he said.
Burke is also a leading advocate of a restoration of the church's older rites and traditions, like the Latin Mass, which he argues were heedlessly cast aside in the liberal "euphoria" after the reforms of the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s. [Liberal euphoria, love the term! Like Hippie Revolution! No wonder we had "Jesus Christ: Superstar". Aquarius!!!!]
But Burke has been celebrating so many old-style liturgies and donning the most ornate regalia -- long trains of watered silk, velvet gloves and elaborate brocades -- that several Vatican officials said he had been asked to "tone it down a bit." [Did they ask Archbishop Piero Marini to tone down his theatrical Masses during JP2's time? Nah. But when it is something traditional, expect the inculturated maniacs to throw a hissy fit.]
Whether he will is another matter.
"The vestments, everything, are part of a tradition," Burke says in his defense. "We need to understand that and not just discard it and say, well, it was all just an ugly accretion." [If anything old must be discarded......then away with those nutty old inculturated liturgists!! Ha! Cybercrime this dude!]
Burke also got into hot water in 2009 when he taped an interview for anti-abortion activist Randall Terry in which he chided his fellow bishops for not taking a harder line in denying Communion to pro-choice politicians or those who support gay marriage. Those bishops, he said, are "weakening the faith of everyone." [Saying like it is! Really love this cardinal! My predictions of him being a cardinal under Pope Benedict XVI were right, y'all!]
Burke later apologized, but he has continued to press fellow bishops to speak out as strongly as he does. "If the shepherd isn't obedient, the flock easily gives way to confusion and error," he said during a 2010 speech to an anti-abortion group.
For Burke, the risks are too high to remain on the sidelines. Obama's presidency and the advancement of issues like gay marriage and abortion rights have made it imperative for Catholic bishops to speak up, he says, though he realizes that the president is ahead in the polls and could well win. "I don't know what would happen if that would be the case," he said, shaking his head.
But he said he has been encouraged that a growing number of bishops appear to be joining the campaign for religious freedom that has targeted White House policies on contraception coverage, because he believes that Christians in the U.S. could well face direct governmental persecution for their beliefs.
"These are definitive moments and the stakes are as high as you can get," Burke says. "That really pleases me, that more bishops are speaking out on their own."
In the end, that kind of activism by the bishops he helps appoint may be Raymond Burke's true legacy.
***
Well, the critics of Cardinal Burke would certainly be against his fashion style....
Blessing people like this...
Modeling a hat like this....
Dressing up for Mass like this....
Creating new deacons and priests like this....
Hanging with such friends such as these...
and this... (gotta put them in, ha!)
And thinking like...(How deep a scar would this leave on a Mr. Constitutionalist's coconut?)
Ha! That was me talking.
They would protest if he does his job as a Catholic bishop. If he speaks only what the Church teaches, the liberals and Modernists would react.
BUT!
They would not react if they see...
The Precious Blood placed in a wine goblet and pitcher to look like Kool-Aid from our favorite GULP Liturgical Abuser, who thankfully is not archbishop of Los Angeles anymore, Roger Cardinal Mahony...
They would not react if the bishop is dressed up for and offers Mass like this...
or hangs out with guys like these...
Yes the dang Masons were acting like they were co-consecrating.
and happily called to the altar.....with a female EMHC masking as a priestess...Ha!
DO WE HEAR ANYONE OF THOSE LIBERALS REACTING?
Nah....
Silence means "Yes"
BREAKING NEWS! Former papal butler names two cardinals...
As someone who "influenced" him!
And they are Cardinals Angelo Comastri , Paolo Sardi
Cardinal Angelo Comastri is the Archpriest of St. Peter's Basilica.
Cardinal Paolo Sardi is the current patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.
Whatever the two cardinals would gain from the leaks, who knows?!
The butler may be making things up.
And they are Cardinals Angelo Comastri , Paolo Sardi
Cardinal Angelo Comastri is the Archpriest of St. Peter's Basilica.
Cardinal Paolo Sardi is the current patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta.
Whatever the two cardinals would gain from the leaks, who knows?!
The butler may be making things up.
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
SSPX - Holy See discussions turning sour?
Well, Andrea Tornielli thinks it is coming to a halt!
***
During the conference, the prelate said: “On 30 June 2012 – this is a secret but will be revealed to the public – the Pope himself wrote a letter to our Superior General, Mgr. Fellay: “I confirm to you that in order to be fully reintegrated into the Catholic Church, you must really accept the Second Vatican Council and the post-conciliar teachings.” [The Council did happen. The SSPX must accept that and whatever came out of it. To deny it or to smorgasbord it, the SSPX will be committing the same crime they are accusing the modernists, well, which quite frankly the modernists are guilty of. They must accept it. To not accept it and to claim that the Council committed an error is almost the same as accusing the Church as being fallible! Unthinkable!]
“This really is a sticking point – Tissier de Mallerais said – because we cannot accept or sign something like this. Clarifications can be made as the Council is so vast and it does have its positive points but this is not the essential element of the Council.” [Hmmm...interesting.]
The Lefebvrian bishop was very tough in some of the points he made during the conference: “Weapons cannot be surrendered right in the middle of a battle; we will not look for a truce while the war rages on, with the beatification of a fake beatification, that of Pope John Paul II. This was fake, it was a fake beatification. And with the requirement, continuously stressed by Benedict XVI, that we accept the Council and the reforms to the post-conciliar teachings.” [And now they are questioning the action of Pope Benedict XVI. Remember that when the pope beatifies or canonizes a dead Catholic, it is a solemn declaration that that person is enjoying the Beatific Vision and thus we Catholics here on earth (Church Militant) can invoke their intercession and imitate their example. It is an infallible declaration that the person is in HEAVEN! Will de Mallerais also question the lifting of the excommunication because, remember, they do not believe on Day 1 that they are excommunicated!]
Tissier de Mallerais also said that “the collegiality that destroys the power of the Pope who no longer dares to show resistance to the bishops’ conferences.” [Actually, there is nothing wrong with collegiality. What is wrong is too much diplomacy when dealing with the bishops' conferences. Much of what came out from Rome quite frankly is a pat on the hand.] He added that ecumenism “allows respect for the values of salvation of false religions and Protestantism, of false things,” while religious freedom “allows the free construction of mosques in our countries.” [Uhm....ecumenisms real end is to bring people into the one fold of Christ, Christians and no-Christians, including the SSPX who insist on staying away from Peter. Religious freedom gives ALL people to practice their religions freely. Where in the hell did it say that it only concerns Muslims? Ugh.]
“Evidently – the Lefebvrian bishop said – we cannot sign such an agreement. There isn’t and never will be agreement over this point.” Despite “modernist Rome’s” insistence, [He called Pope Benedict XVI a heretic.] Tissier stressed: “Personally I will never sign anything like this that is for sure. I will never accept that the new Mass is legitimate or licit; I believe it lacks validity, as Mgr. Lefebvre used to say. I will never accept the idea that “the Council, if interpreted correctly, could be made to correspond with the Tradition [and that] an acceptable meaning could be found.” [So, he just said that the Church is in error and thus the promise of Christ is fallible. Unless, they think they are the last remaining Catholics on earth, which they actually think they are....and so does other radical traditionalist groups once allied with the SSPX. Weird eh!]
After calling the doctrinal preamble which Cardinal William Levada delivered to Fellay, “false”, the Lefebvrian bishop said some “very mild and soft” decisions were taken at the General Chapter of the Society of St. Pius X, convened last July, so as to “present Rome with such great obstacles that it would be prevented from making any new proposals to us. But the Devil is evil and I think they will strike again, so I am discreetly preparing to defend us and the Fraternity will defend itself.” [Who the "they" is, I was hoping de Mallerais spelled it out.]
***
As it turns out, there is a long way to go with the SSPX.
Vatican II is one issue that must be addressed DECISIVELY not by any Council, but by Peter himself!
I hope that THAT document will address it.
SYLLABUS OF ERRORS!
Labels:
ecumenism,
pope benedict xvi,
SSPX,
vaticanista analysis
GULP Alert: And they still call it a.....MASS
Well, it still is.
But looks more like your typical Evangelical worship service, which makes we wonder...
Why do we keep on insisting that we look like Protestants and Evangelicals?
WE ARE CATHOLICS FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!!
This is just one of the liturgical abuse festival we see every week at ABS-CBN.
Just a reminder, and this came from a little known Cardinal named, Francis Arinze, from a little known Roman dicastery called Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments...
From Cardinal Arinze, an interview in 2004, from the Adoremus Site.
Has liturgical dance been approved for Masses by your office?
There has never been a document from our Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments saying that dance is approved in the Mass.
The question of dance is difficult and delicate. However, it is good to know that the tradition of the Latin Church has not known the dance. It is something that people are introducing in the last ten years -- or twenty years. It was not always so. Now it is spreading like wildfire, one can say, in all the continents -- some more than others. In my own continent, Africa, it is spreading.
In Asia, it is spreading.
Now, some priests and lay people think that Mass is never complete without dance. The difficulty is this: we come to Mass primarily to adore God -- what we call the vertical dimension. We do not come to Mass to entertain one another. That's not the purpose of Mass.
The parish hall is for that.
So all those that want to entertain us -- after Mass, let us go to the parish hall and then you can dance. And then we clap. But when we come to Mass we don't come to clap. We don't come to watch people, to admire people. We want to adore God, to thank Him, to ask Him pardon for our sins, and to ask Him for what we need.
Don't misunderstand me, because when I said this at one place somebody said to me: "you are an African bishop. You Africans are always dancing. Why do you say we don't dance?"
A moment -- we Africans are not always dancing! [laughter]
Moreover, there is a difference between those who come in procession at Offertory; they bring their gifts, with joy. There is a movement of the body right and left. They bring their gifts to God. That is good, really. And some of the choir, they sing. They have a little bit of movement. Nobody is going to condemn that. And when you are going out again, a little movement, it's all right.
But when you introduce wholesale, say, a ballerina, then I want to ask you what is it all about. What exactly are you arranging? When the people finish dancing in the Mass and then when the dance group finishes and people clap -- don't you see what it means? It means we have enjoyed it. We come for enjoyment. Repeat.
So, there is something wrong. Whenever the people clap -- there is something wrong -- immediately. When they clap -- a dance is done and they clap.
It is possible that there could be a dance that is so exquisite that it raises people's minds to God, and they are praying and adoring God and when the dance is finished they are still wrapped up in prayer. But is that the type of dance you have seen? You see. It is not easy.
Most dances that are staged during Mass should have been done in the parish hall. And some of them are not even suitable for the parish hall.
I saw in one place -- I will not tell you where -- where they staged a dance during Mass, and that dance was offensive. It broke the rules of moral theology and modesty. Those who arranged it -- they should have had their heads washed with a bucket of holy water! [laughter]
Why make the people of God suffer so much? Haven't we enough problems already? Only Sunday, one hour, they come to adore God. And you bring a dance! Are you so poor you have nothing else to bring us? Shame on you! That's how I feel about it.
Somebody can say, "but the pope visited this county and the people danced". A moment: Did the pope arrange it? Poor Holy Father -- he comes, the people arranged. He does not know what they arranged. And somebody introduces something funny -- is the pope responsible for that? Does that mean it is now approved? Did they put in on the table of the Congregation for Divine Worship? We would throw it out! If people want to dance, they know where to go.
Monday, October 1, 2012
GULP Alert: Just acting or plain liturgical madness?
I can't even type more words than this.
I had a severe migraine attack just looking at this.
Even if it were a play during the Mass, which is a liturgical abuse, it is still done in bad taste.
The Apostles...offering a lighted candle!!!
Bah hum bug!
PS: The fourth guy from the left has that "What the hell am I doing?!" look! Hahahaha!!!
I had a severe migraine attack just looking at this.
Even if it were a play during the Mass, which is a liturgical abuse, it is still done in bad taste.
The Apostles...offering a lighted candle!!!
Bah hum bug!
PS: The fourth guy from the left has that "What the hell am I doing?!" look! Hahahaha!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














