We must not think of the RH Bill as a matter of morality & religion alone. We must think of the people who are at stake & the goals the RH Bill seeks to acheive: reducing childbirth mortality rates, alleviating poverty and advancing not only women's rights, but human rights as well. Bow
Well, I will translate this in a language that humans can understand:
1. We must not think of the RH Bill as a matter of morality and religion alone
[If you want to push for a bill to become a law that tramples upon the moral principles of the religion of the majority of tax payers, then it is an issue! Get over it!]
2. We must think of the people who are at stake
[Have you thought about the 1 week old person in the womb who will die with your abortifacient pill?]
4. the goals the RH Bill seeks to acheive: [sic] reducing childbirth mortality rates
[You obviously do not know the cause of high childbirth mortality. IT IS THE MEDICAL FACILITY STUPID!]
5. alleviating poverty
[not better governance? not stopping graft and corruption? not economic activity? less people, less poverty? Go talk to India and China!]
6. and advancing not only women's rights, but human rights as well
[how about the right of the unborn? why don't we start with that eh?]
BOW!
"..reducing childbirth mortality rates"
ReplyDeleteOr she was pointing to "natality" rate then? Didn't read this in the bill.
I thought this one is counter-intuitive or she is lost in words!