Below is an excerpt from the article entitled "Inculturation of Worship: Forty Years of Progress and Tradition" by Anscar J. Chupungco, OSB, the master of the liturgical inculturation in the Philippines.
***
After Pope John XXIII announced the Vatican Council II, a preparatory commission on the liturgy was established on June 6, 1960. The composition of the preparatory commission was indicative of the type of reform that the Liturgy Constitution would eventually espouse. Most of the members and consultors were scholars who knew their liturgical history. [Except those in the Concilium who fabricated a New Mass!] They admired the noble simplicity and sobriety of the original Roman liturgy before it had merged in the eighth century with Franco-Germanic rites. [As if everything that came after the ‘original’ Roman liturgy is rubbish. As if the Mass celebrated for hundreds of years by popes and saints is outdated, needs to be replaced since it is full of rubbish inculturation! Oh yeah! That is YOUR BRAND!]
Ironically, the inculturation of the Roman liturgy by the Franco-Germanic churches induced the disappearance of its classical shape. It took twelve centuries for the Roman Catholic Church to recover the noble simplicity of its worship. It would not have taken this long, had Rome heeded in the sixteenth century Martin Luther’s call for liturgical reform. [ See where this is heading? This is what liturgists like Fr. Chupungco would want you to believe in. That the Mass of the Ages that our ancestors used to worship God is corrupted by the inculturation of Franco-Germanic churches, the same tactic of inculturation you so viciously promote? Do you even consider yourself a Catholic for siding with the heretical views of Martin Luther, who was condemned by the Church? Anathema sit!]
...Firmly rooted in the premises of the liturgical movement, the Liturgy Constitution sets forth active participation as the principle and criterion of the conciliar reform of the liturgy. Art. 14 states, "In the reform and promotion of the liturgy, this full and active participation by all the people is the aim to be considered before all else". The theology on which the Constitution bases itself is the doctrine on what would later be called "common priesthood" by the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium. According to the Liturgy Constitution, active participation is "called for by the very nature of the liturgy" and that such participation by the Christian people "is their right and duty by reason of their baptism" (art. 14). [not the same priesthood as the ordained one! The CCC is clear about this! Unless you purposely ] I am certain that Martin Luther would have smiled in triumph should he read those lines. [Smiling…where is he if I might ask? We all know where and you even have the audacity to admire the heretic!] Let me note that the ultimate aim of liturgical inculturation is to foster active participation in consonance with the cultural patterns or traits of the local community. [The Church’s aim or your aim? Clearly it’s your own agenda Father and not the Church’s. FYI, YOU ARE NOT THE CHURCH!]
***
Clearly, this man disguising himself as a Catholic priest is well on the way to heresy. For every rubbish he has said and done for the Church in the Philippines, I have one conclusion for this... laetae sententiae!
His works prove how more Lutheran the man is!
No comments:
Post a Comment