Pages

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Urgent Prayer Request: American Papist critically injured



Thomas Peters, the famed American Papist and blogger of CatholicVote.org suffered a serious neck injury.

A prayer request has also been posted on the website.

His father, the famous and revered canonist, Dr. Edward Peters posted this on his Facebook page.

Thomas Peters remains in critical but stable condition with a cervical spinal cord injury. His lungs are looking better. He and Natalie Zmuda Peters know of your prayers, as do we all.
Please pause for a moment and say Three Hail Mary's and ask the healing intercession of Fr. Michael McGivney, founder of the Knights of Columbus for Tom Peters' immediate healing.



God, our Father, protector of the poor and defender of the widow and orphan, you called your priest, Father Michael J. McGivney, to be an apostle of Christian family life and to lead the young to the generous service of their neighbor. Through the example of his life and virtue may we follow your Son, Jesus Christ, more closely, fulfilling his commandment of charity and building up his Body which is the Church.  Let the inspiration of your servant prompt us to greater confidence in your love so that we may continue his work of caring for the needy and the outcast. We humbly ask that you glorify your venerable servant Father Michael J. McGivney on earth according to the design of your holy will. Through his intercession, grant the favor I now present (here make your request). Through Christ our Lord. Amen. (Our Father, Hail Mary, Glory be.)


LATEST UPDATE:  (08:12 PST)

Dr. Edward Peters
Thom can move his arms, docs are discussing the best treatment for his neck injury. Immediate concern is for the considerable water in his lungs. We are astounded at the expressions of prayers and support. Thom & Nat know about it. Please keep them up. Love from us all, EdP.


Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Happy Feast of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel



I always wear my Brown Scapular.

Are you?

Look who always wore them!  :)





I have blogged about this wonderful sacramental so many times in the past.

Click here and here and here to read them.

Ave Maria!  Ora pro nobis!



PS:  The RH Law suffered another blow on this very day.  Coincidence?  I don't think so.



Advice to priests



Kaya ganito ang porma ko!





Yeahhhh!!!!


Former Jesuit provincial leaving the order and the priesthood because...

...he can't stand what the Church teaches.

And he is 80 years old.

Here is the full text of his letter.

***



June 2013

TO : Family, Relatives, and Friends, Colleagues and Partners in Ministry, CLC Members, Ignatian Associates, Project Mankind, Parishioners of St. John’s, St Benedict the Moor, Sacred Heart, Jesuit Classmates and Companions

FROM: Bert Thelen, S.J., June, 2013


Dearly Beloved,

May the Grace of Jesus Christ, the Love of God, and the Peace of the Holy Spirit be with you! I am writing to tell you about what may be the most important decision of my life since entering the Jesuits. With God’s help, at the behest of my religious superiors and the patient support and wise encouragement of my CLC group and closest friends, I have decided to leave ordained Jesuit ministry and return to the lay state, the priesthood of the faithful [alarm bells!  He does not call it the priesthood of Jesus Christ.  No.  His ordination came from the people, not from the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity.]  bestowed on me by my Baptism nearly 80 years ago. [He is about to become an octogenarian to make this decision.] I do this with confidence and humility, clarity and wonder, gratitude and hope, joy and sorrow. No bitterness, no recrimination, no guilt, no regrets.  [As you read on later, it is anything but NO bitterness.]

It has been a wonderful journey, a surprising adventure, an exploration into the God Who dwells mysteriously in all of our hearts. I will always be deeply grateful to the Society of Jesus for the formation, education, companionship, and ministry it has provided, and to my family for their constant support. I can never thank God enough for the loving and loyal presence in my life of each and every one of you.

Why am I doing this? How did I reach this decision? I will try to tell you now. That is the purpose of this letter. For about 15 years now, as many of you have noticed, I have had a “Lover’s Quarrel” with the Catholic Church. I am a cradle Catholic and grew up as Catholic as anyone can, with Priests and even Bishops in our household, and 17 years of Catholic education at St. Monica’s Grade School, Milwaukee Messmer High School, and Marquette University. I took First Vows at Oshkosh in the Society of Jesus at age 25 and was ordained at Gesu Church to the priesthood ten years later in 1968. I have served the Church as a Jesuit priest in Milwaukee, Omaha, and Pine Ridge for 45 years, including 18 years on the Province Staff culminating in my being the Wisconsin Provincial for six years and attending the 34th General Congregation in Rome.

My last 14 years at Creighton and St. John’s have been the best years of my life. I have truly enjoyed and flourished serving as pastor of St. John’s. I cannot even put into words how graced and loved and supported I have been by the parishioners, parish staff, campus ministry, Ignatian Associates, and CLC members! It is you who have freed, inspired, and encouraged me to the New Life to which I am now saying a strong and joyful “Yes.” You have done this by challenging me to be my best self as a disciple of Jesus, to proclaim boldly His Gospel of Love, and to widen the horizons of my heart to embrace the One New World we are called to serve in partnership with each other and our Triune God. It is the Risen Christ Who beckons me now toward a more universal connection with the Cosmos, the infinitely large eco-system we are all part of, the abundance and vastness of what Jesus called “the Reign of God.”  [Obviously his fellow Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin influenced this.  He just got CHRISTIFIED!  Booya!]

Why does this “YES” to embrace the call of our cosmic inter-connectedness mean saying “NO” to ordained ministry? My answer is simple but true. All mystical traditions, as well as modern science, teach us that we humans cannot be fully ourselves without being in communion with all that exists. Lasting justice for Earth and all her inhabitants is only possible within this sacred communion of being. We need conversion – conversion from the prevailing consciousness that views reality in terms of separateness, dualism, and even hierarchy, to a new awareness of ourselves as inter-dependent partners , sharing in one Earth-Human community. [His going for the jugular here!]  In plainer words, we need to end the world view that structures reality into higher and lower, superior and inferior, dominant and subordinate, which puts God over Humanity, [the pagans know better.  Even atheists know better that there is a hierarchy of things in the universe.] humans over the rest of the world, men over women, the ordained over the laity. As Jesus commanded so succinctly, “Don’t Lord it over anyone … serve one another in love.” As an institution, the Church is not even close to that idea; its leadership works through domination, control, and punishment. [I think he skipped the page where Jesus said "I give to you the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven.  Whatever you declare bound in heaven..."  That pretty much talks a lot about leadership with control, no?  And he does even recall what St. Paul wrote about the qualifications of a bishop, presbyter and deacon.  That sounds like hierarchy to me, noh?  So what kind of church is this man talking about?  I blogged about this a couple of times.  He is of the same mold as the other liberals who want same sex marriage, contraception, laicization and the likes.  Not surprising though, considering he is a Jesuit.  Ha!  Or was.  Ha!]  So, following my call to serve this One World [New World Order!  Illuminati!  Ha!]  requires me to stop benefiting from the privilege, security, and prestige ordination has given me. I am doing this primarily out of the necessity and consequence of my new call, but, secondarily, as a protest against the social injustices and sinful exclusions perpetrated by a patriarchal church that refuses to consider ordination for women and marriage for same- sex couples.  [In reality, what he cannot accept is what Christ Himself did not allow.  Christ will never ever accept homosexual acts nor homosexuals living together like they are husband and wife, when in fact they are both husband, and both wife.  Christ did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it. (cf. Mt. 5:17)]

I have become convinced that the Catholic Church will never give up its clerical privilege until and unless we priests (and bishops) willingly step down from our pedestals. Doing this would also put me in solidarity with my friend, Roy Bourgeois, my fellow Jesuit, Fr. Bill Brennan, the late Bernard Cooke, and many other men who have been “de-frocked” by the reigning hierarchy. [And he thinks it will ever change.  Dude!  2,000 years.  Count it!]  It will also support the religious and lay women, former Catholics, and gay and lesbian couples marginalized by our church. I want to stand with and for them. I am, if you will, choosing to de-frock myself in order to serve God more faithfully, truly, and universally.  [Whoever the god he has in mind though...]

But why leave the Jesuits? Make no mistake about it: the Society of Jesus shares in and benefits from this patriarchal and clerical way of proceeding. [THEY DO?!?!?!  Wow!]  We still regard ourselves as the shepherds and those to whom and with whom we minister as sheep. I discovered this painfully when the Society of Jesus decided against having Associate members. We are not prepared for co-membership or even, it seems at times, for collaboration, though we pay lip service to it. “Father knows best” remains the hallmark of our way of proceeding. I can no longer, in conscience, do that. But I still honor and love my fellow Jesuits who work from that model of power over. It is still where we all are as a company, a Society, a community of vowed religious in the Roman Catholic church.  Leaving behind that companionship is not easy for me, but it is the right thing for me to do at this time in my life. When I went through a formal discernment process with my CLC group, one member whose brilliance and integrity I have always admired and whose love and loyalty to the Jesuits is beyond question, said of my decision, “You cannot NOT do this!” He had recognized God’s call in me.  [Well...did he follow you?]

A few other considerations may help clarify my path. The Church is in transition – actually in exile. In the Biblical tradition, the Egyptian, Assyrian and Babylonian captivities led to great religious reforms and the creation of renewed covenants. Think of Moses, Jeremiah, and Isaiah. I think a similar reform is happening in our Catholic faith (as well as other traditions). [Wha?!?  Moses, Jeremiah and Isaiah were all preparing for the arrival of the promised Messiah.  That is the religious reform they were all waiting.  What in the world is this guy looking for?  A female pope?  Not afr fetched!  Hey!  They have it in the Episcopalian Church!]  We have come through far-reaching, earth-shaking evolutionary changes, and a new (Universal) Church as well as a new (One) World is emerging. [He is reading too much comic books or Dan Brown novels for sure.]  My decision is a baby step in that Great Emergence, a step God is asking me to take.

Consider this. Being a Lay Catholic has sometimes been caricatured as “Pray, pay, and obey.” [Never heard that told to me.  Maybe he was the one saying that.]  Of course, that is a caricature, an exaggeration, a jibe. But it does point to a real problem. [An exaggeration points to a real problem.  Now that is an oxymoron for you!] Recently, the hierarchical church mandated the so-called revision of the Roman Missal without consulting the People of God. [And the hierarchy is not part of the People of God.  Maybe we can ask Joe the Plumber how to run the country's health care policy.  Yeah, any simpleton can decide on anything there is under the sun.  Maybe he can ask Jane the Ballet Dancer to perform his next medical check up because anyone calling themselves People of God can do that, like translating Latin into modern English.]  It was both a foolish and a self-serving effort to increase the authority of Ordained men, damaging and even in some ways taking away the “Pray” part of “Pray, pay, and obey.” [How in the world did "And with your spirit" increased the power of the ordained.  He must have felt it...  Did you Fr. Jojo, Fr. Bob, Fr. Z???]  No wonder more and more Catholics are worshipping elsewhere, [because the Mass is boring???  We need more dance moves?  We need to ask people to clap more often at Mass?]  and some enlightened priests feel compromised in their roles. [Compromised?  How in the world will this priest feel if the priests were asked to celebrate Mass, Novus Ordo, ad orientem?  Oh my!  He might hang himself for praying to God with the people facing the same direction rather than looking and smiling at each other from across the table, er...altar.]  I, for one, feel that this so-called renewal , though licit, is not valid.  [Licit but not valid.  Did this guy come from a sedevacantist group or from those Facebook groups of Google Theologians and Liturgists?] It is not pleasing to God, and I feel compromised in trying to do it.  [And same sex marriage for him is PLEASING to God.  Wow!  He totally did not read in theology school the writings of a man named Paul....But it is also in the Old Testament, no?  Sodom and Gomorrah?  Does he know what sodomy is and how it is....never mind. Ugh!]

Now, consider this. All of this liturgical, ecclesial, and religious change is located in and strongly influenced by what both science and spirituality have revealed as happening to our world, our planet, our universe. [Wow!  He consulted the stars!  Madam Auring!!!!]  The very earth we are rooted and grounded in, as well as the air we breathe and the water we drink, are being damaged and destroyed even beyond (some say) our capacity to survive. [How in the world is that connected to the Roman Missal???] And, as Fr. John Surette, S.J., has so wisely observed, “Injustice for the human and destruction of Earth’s ecosystem are not two separate injustices. They are one.” Biocide is even more devastating than genocide, because it also kills future inhabitants of our precious Earth.  [And he never even wailed for the countless unborn humans continuously being massacred by their mothers in the womb in the name of choice and progress, no?  And he cries for the polluted air and the dirty river.  Is this what they teach at Theology schools nowadays?  Oh yeah, sorry I forgot.  Booyah Euntes!!!  Oh Shanti!!!]

[Euntes performing their signature song and dance version of the Gloria for the New Church...Who are the people in your neighborhood...in your neighborhood...]

It is time. It is time to abandon our refusal to see that our very environment is central to the survival and well being of ALL earthlings. [You just have a new pagan shaman right in front  of you folks.] It is time for the Church to turn her attention from saving face to saving the earth, from saving souls to saving the planet. [Because the eternal salvation of your soul is nothing is you don't have an earth with clean air and water to live at.  Yeah makes sense.  Makes perfectly idiotic sense!]  It is time to focus on the sacred bond that exists between us and the earth. [Booyah Euntes!  Oh Shanti!!!]  It is time to join the Cosmic Christ [I told you!  He was CHRISTIFIED!  Booyah de Chardin!  Oh Shanti!!!] in the Great Work of mending, repairing, nurturing, and protecting our evolving creation. It is time for a new vision of a universal Church whose all-inclusive justice and unconditional love, an expression of Christ consciousness and the work of the Holy Spirit, empowers ALL and can lead to a future that preserves the true right to life of all of God’s creatures. This includes future generations who will bless us for allowing them to live, evolve, and flourish. Can’t you hear them crying out, “I want to live, I want to grow, I want to be, I want to know?”  [And Christ said "Go out into the world and preach the Gospel to every nation.  Tell them to dump their wastes properly and use lead free gasoline and....Oh no.  Wrong version of the Gospel.]

In light of all this, how can I not respond to the call both Isaiah and Jesus heard, the call of our Baptism? “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because the Lord has anointed me and sent me to bring Good News to the oppressed.” All creation will be freed, and all people will know the freedom and glory of the Children of God. Yes, Lord, I will go. Please send me.

[Oh my God!  Look at that poor tree!  It is hurting!  Look at the barbed wires!  It is oppressed!  We need a savior for that tree!  I wish Isaiah were here to show us how...

Tatadadaaaaaa!!!!

It's a bird, it's a plane...it's.. Oh my!  It's Super Bert!]

And that is why I am leaving Jesuit priesthood. Since first vows I have always thought and hoped and prayed that I would live and die in this least Society of Jesus. But now, something unexpected! A real surprise! I HAVE lived and died in the Society of Jesus, but, now, nearly 80, I have been raised to new life. I am born again – into a much larger world, a much newer creation. [Alive! Alive! Alive forever more!] I have greatly benefited from the spiritual freedom given in and by the Society of Jesus. I feel no longer chained, limited, bound, by the shackles of a judicial, institutional, clerical, hierarchical system. As St. Paul once reminded the early Christians, “It is for freedom that you have been set free.” And as St. Peter, the first Pope, learned when he said to Jesus, “You know that I love you,” love is all about surrender and servanthood.  [And he forgot about the bondage being told by the prophets to the freedom that Christ actually set us free... Liberation Theology sprinkled with a lot of EcoSpirituality.  What do you get?  Euntes!  Booyah!  Oh Shanti!]

Thank you for your attention to this self presentation. [Oh God!  Is this guy related in anyway to Convicted KSP Queen Carlita Celdran???]  I am grateful that you have followed me in the journey described here, and I am sorry for whatever sadness, disappointment, or hurt this may have caused you. [Honestly, I feel different...] But what I have written here is my truth, and I can’t not do it! If you want to discuss this with me, ask questions, or give me feedback, I welcome your response, either by letter, e-mail or phone.
( 402-305-2665 ). Please pray for me, as I do for all of you, the beloved of my heart and soul.

Yours in the Risen Christ, Bert Thelen


***

Right after Vatican II, everyone jumped at the democracy bandwagon in the Church.  Even if Vatican II did not mandate it, everyone started dissing their congregation's Constitution and Rules, some of them written personally by their holy founders.  Most dissed their religious habit to make them "one with the people".  Most even changed the names of the one managing the whole group.  They don't want to be called "superior" because it connotes power and domination.  So they changed it to "minister general" or "servant coordinator" or any other politically correct word that would not convey a sense of authority and lording it over.  But the truth of the matter suddenly dawned on these hippie congregations.  After each congregation had their fair share of headaches and rouge members, they had to stomp their foot and say "this is where the buck stops." and then started flexing their muscles.  The followers who were so sold out to the whole democracy and equality things started wondering "Why is he becoming the ugly patriarch we dumped after Vatican II?"  Whether you like or not, even in big multinational corporation, even in a family, the basic unit of society, it will be the CEO or even the mother or the father who will say "enough is enough.  This is what we will do and all will follow.  No questions.  Nuff said.

From amidst this drama, I say...

THANK YOU.

Thank God he decided to leave than to stay in the ministry and in the Church and continuously tear Her up apart with his heresy.

Anymore jesuits and dissenting cleric and religious out there want to follow him and join his One World Church?

Yeah, you two.  I'll sponsor your ticket.





And a final word from your ultra-montanist Founder, defender of the Catholic Faith par excellence, obedient son of the Catholic Church, scourge of heretical Protestants...



Monday, July 15, 2013

Number of vacant sees in the Church rising!


Lots of vacant cathedras


Maybe this is the reason why a private secretary of a cardinal feels he too will become a monsignor and then a bishop in the near future!

Ha!

Asa ka pa.

I got this from the National Catholic Register.



***

A crisis of sorts is developing in the appointment of Catholic bishops worldwide as a backlog of 187 sees (not including China) remain vacant.  [Woooowwww!!!!]

According to figures on Catholic-Hierarchy.org, eight U.S. dioceses are without a bishop, plus two U.S. eparchies (dioceses of Eastern rite churches).

These include the diocese of Bridgeport, Connecticut which hasn’t had a bishop since March 2012 when Mons. William Lori was appointed Archbishop of Baltimore.

Others include Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Fort Worth, Texas; Rochester, NY; and Marquette, Michigan, vacated by Mons. Alexander Sample in January on his appointment as Archbishop of Portland, Oregon.

Half of Scotland’s ordinaries – four out of eight – have yet to be appointed, including the archdiocese of St. Andrews and Edinburgh which suddenly fell vacant in February after the resignation of Cardinal Keith Patrick O’Brien.

The Philippines, meanwhile, has nine sees with a bishop. In January this year, retired Filipino Archbishop Oscar Cruz noted there were then 10 vacant sees in the country and thought it might be the highest number in recent history. He wondered if the Vatican might have been having a hard time in appointing new bishops for the country. [or seeing how some bishops in the Philippines are performing, maybe the Holy See really HAS to screen well those who are nominated.  Ever wonder what Bishop Ongtioco did to Mr. Joaquin Bernas and his online tirade against the bishops for standing up against contraception?  One word.  NOTHING.  Bishop Ongtioco did NOTHING against this public dissenter!  And you wonder why the Holy See is having a hard time?  Sheesh!]

“Maybe they are looking for a certain qualification, a way of doing things or a way of thinking…there is no fast rule on this really,” he said, adding he was not worried as he was confident the Vatican would soon appoint new bishops.

England also has two important dioceses that need a bishop: the archdiocese of Liverpool, vacant since February, and Leeds which has been without an ordinary since June 2012.

Italy is one of those countries faring the worst: 12 vacant sees, two vacant territorial abbeys, and one eparchy.

Meanwhile, some dioceses, such as Wilcannia-Forbes in Australia and Mansa in Zambia, haven’t had a bishop since 2009.  [That is way too long! Wonder what is keeping the appointments.]

Sees that fell vacant during Benedict's pontificate, and which remain so, number the most – 131 out of 187. Since Pope Francis was elected, 36 dioceses fell vacant and continue to be without a bishop.

Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said he was unaware of the reasons, and did not know what the average period is for dioceses to remain without a bishop. [Well, what does Fr. Lombardi actually KNOW?  Sheesh!  I miss Dr. Navarro-Valls!]  But he added he “wouldn’t be surprised” if, during the time of transition from one pontificate to another, and with “everything that has significance for the normal operation of ecclesiastical institutions, a certain delay in pending procedures has resulted.”  [See that?  The article already notes that there have already been vacant sees during the time of Benedict in the Chair of Peter. And Fr. Lombardi attributes it to the change in management?  See what I told you.]

Since his election, the Holy Father has had many pressing duties competing for his attention, not least reforming the Roman Curia and the Vatican Bank. [Better way of putting it.] But delays in the appointment of bishops is becoming a concern, and one no doubt he will wish to tackle sooner rather than later.

***

There are so many reasons why there are apostolic vicariates, prelatures, dioceses and eparchies and territorial abbeys that still have no bishop or abbot.  We don't know the reason and even the politics behind the delay in the appointments.

But we must continually pray that the bishops appointed are those who genuinely care for the flock of Christ and not those careerists, like the ones mentioned by Pope Francis, or like the private secretary I mentioned.  (By the way, that private secretary wears a ring on his right hand instead of the usual left hand.  The left hand is where the wedding ring is worn and where the professed religious and even some priests wear the ring of their consecration.  This private secretary wears it on the right hand.  This is hand where the BISHOPs wear the episcopal ring.  Feeling di ba?  Ha!)

"You shall know them by their fruits" as the Gospel tells us.  And these bishops caused more harm than good to the Church.  We even asked why they were even placed there in the first place.




If you are still wondering, ask Christ why He chose this guy to be part of the Twelve.


There are things in this world that we cannot always find an answer to.

Let us just pray for the Holy Father.

Let us pray for the shepherds after his heart (see Jeremiah 3:15)






What is so evident in the apostolates of Chupungcan Liturgists


There is a not so old news about Pope Francis defending Summorum Pontificum from Italian bishops who expressed their dismay over the motu propio liberalizing the Traditional Latin Mass.

One salient point mentioned in one of my fave blogs, Hermeneutic of Continuity, that posted this news is the observation of Fr Tim Finigan, owner of the blog about the attitude of these bishops:

"One thing that jumps out of the story is that the bishops of this region judged that their main pastoral priority - to be communicated to the Pope on a five-yearly visit - was to attack Summorum Pontificum. Forget abortion, embryo experimentation, the push for same-sex marriage throughout Europe, the loss of faith of many Catholics and our failure in catechesis and evangelisation. No, the really big problem is a small number of priests legitimately saying the old Mass. Given what Pope Francis has said about the danger of being a self-referential Church, I can well imagine he gave them short shrift."

Quite honestly...THIS is the same attitude of Chupungcan Liturgists!

The likes of Fr. Genaro Diwa, Fr. Reginald Malicdem and all those at the Liturgy helm in the Archdiocese of Manila continue to suppress the implementation of Summorum Pontificum.

To continuously mock in their classes, in seminars, in talks the liturgical teachings and practices of Benedict XVI.

Yeah, of course they are liturgists...but they are also priests!

They owe their obedience to the Pope.  They openly defied this pope when he was still gloriously reigning!  And now that he is emeritus, they continuously mock him!

They have made it their battle cry to fight whatever it is expressed in the motu propio.

Forget the RH Law or even other issues attacking the heart of civilization and Christianity.

What is important is to destroy the teachings of Benedict XVI in the liturgy because for them is more important that contraception, homosexual marriage, divorce and other issues attacking the Church.

Their silence against these issues is deafening!

One of the legacies of the late dean of Filipino liturgist!

God have mercy on his soul!

Just as Fr. Z once blogged, "He did more harm than good."


Diwa


Malicdem

Saturday, July 13, 2013

How a Jesuit "respects" the Holy Name and their Holy Founder...

A way to market their order and founder, Jesuit priests, Fr. James Martin and Fr. Jack McLain, are promoting this Jesuit World Youth Day Slippers.




And here is a screenshot of how Fr. Martin promotes this pair of flip flops.


Yeah, right.

Step on the face of your founder.

And by the way, that is not just the seal of the Jesuit order.

That is the sacred Christogram you will be stepping on.

Do these two Jesuits and whoever thought of making this have no concept of what is respectful or not anymore?

Makes you wonder if the Jesuits even have an idea that their society was named after Jesus Himself.

If they can do this to their founder and the Holy Name of Jesus, would you be surprised if some Jesuits are silent about respecting this?


\

In the meantime, please pray the following:

May the most holy, most sacred, most adorable,
most incomprehensible and ineffable Name of God
be forever praised, blessed, loved, adored
and glorified in Heaven, on earth,
and under the earth,
by all the creatures of God,
and by the Sacred Heart of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
in the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar.
Amen.



Lord God, I thank you today for the gift of my life,
And for the lives of all my brothers and sisters.

I know there is nothing that destroys more life than abortion,
Yet I rejoice that you have conquered death
by the Resurrection of Your Son.

I am ready to do my part in ending abortion.
Today I commit myself
Never to be silent,
Never to be passive,
Never to be forgetful of the unborn.

I commit myself to be active in the pro-life movement,
And never to stop defending life
Until all my brothers and sisters are protected,
And our nation once again becomes
A nation with liberty and justice
Not just for some, but for all.

Through Christ our Lord. Amen!



The miracle brought by Ven. Alvaro del Portillo





The venerable raised the boy to life!!!

We'll anyone from the atheists and agnostics care to explain with science what just happened?

Any takers?



TLM in Japan c/o Una Voce!

Here are some pics of the memorable Traditional Latin Mass held on July 6, 2013 at St. Anselm Church, Meguro, Tokyo with Fr. Robert Paul A. Zarate celebrating.  In case the name sounds familiar, Fr. Bob is the blogger behind Pari sa Japan, which I recently posted about.  :)

Oh, by the way, he is Filipino.  :)


 They prayed the Rosary and the Litany of Loreto before the Mass.

The Confiteor


The genuflection


The elevation of the Blessed Lord.


Brick by brick...the kids, ah!  Hope springs!



Thursday, July 11, 2013

To all loyal believers of the late Fr. Anscar Chupungco...

and that means you Fr. Geny Diwa, Fr. Reginald Malicdem and other professional liturgists who make a living tinkering with the Mass, doing something creative all the time...



And you too Bishop Rey Evangelista.



Don't ever do this again in the Mass...please!




Dissecting John XXIII and John Paul II



from this website

***

On the same day the Vatican released Pope Francis' first encyclical Lumen Fidei ("the light of faith"), the Vatican also announced that Pope John XXIII and Pope John Paul II would be canonized by the end of the year. [The report says anytime this year, not by the "end of the year".] A second miracle was approved for the canonization of John Paul II, but for John XXIII, Pope Francis chose to wave the requirement of a second miracle[...........] We asked our Aleteia Experts what they thought about the news.


Held in High Regard

"John XXIII and John Paul II exemplified the same thing--a creative, faithful response to the grievous challenges faced by the Church," Catholic author John Zmirak told Aletiea, "one that rebukes modernity's mistakes but also learns from it. They avoided both relativism and rigidity, walking a tightrope between opposing errors. That's what the Church always strives to do."

Fr. Michael Heintz points to their leadership during trying times. "[B]oth led the Church on earth during truly dramatic days: John XXIII intervened, for example, during the Cuban Missile Crisis and shepherded the People of God through the beginnings of the 1960s ferment. John Paul II was (we now know more clearly than ever) instrumental in dismantling the Communist regimes in Eastern Europe and he did so through both cagey diplomacy and valiant moral courage and witness -- and without ever advocating violence." [unlike Liberation Theology!]

"[John Paul II's] commitment to the cause of life was not an abstraction," Fr Frank Pavone, director of Priests for Life, told Aleteia. "It was palpable. What we read in the encyclical Evangelium Vitae (The Gospel of Life), which he considered to be one of the most important of his writings, came to life in meetings with him."

"It was a conviction and a passion that combined mercy and strength, the willingness to confront secular power and the ability to pick up the pieces of broken lives. Whether speaking with him about the help that has to be given to those who have had abortions, or the need to declare that laws allowing abortion are in fact invalid as laws, he was equally strong, and it was clear that what he was saying was coming from his very being, not just from an intellectual grasp of the issues."

Our experts acknowledged that there were problems in the Church during their pontificates, but agreed they thought John XXIII and John Paul II responded as best they could.

"The sex abuse scandal in the Catholic Church did take place while these two men were 'in charge' of the Church universal so they should bear some responsibility. Like all people, saints included, the standard is not perfection, but faithfulness," Allan Wright, Academic Dean of Evangelization for the Diocese of Paterson, NJ, told Aleteia. "In looking at the early church we read of scandal with almost every Christian community St. Paul writes too. He wrote to them in order to clarify what the teaching of Christ is, theology, is and then to explain how one ought to act, morality. Pope John XXIII and John Paul II did the same."

Anthony Esolen, literature professor at Providence College, thinks the blame for some of the problems should be spread throughout the episcopacy. "I'm not saying that John Paul II could not have acted more swiftly and decisively. He trusted his bishops too much -- the very same bishops who typically griped at him behind his back for supposedly being authoritarian."  [Imagine if John Paul was not THAT authoritarian and the Holy Father relegated much of the governance to the COLLEGIALITY of the bishops.  Imagine what would have happened!  Oh... It already did.]

Catholic writer and lecturer James Likoudis also placed some of the blame on the episcopacy in general. "Too often ignored was the failure of collegiality during the turbulent post-conciliar disorders as too many Bishops ignored the tidal wave of rebellion within the Church and the onslaught of those who had made shipwreck of the faith." [Many bishops were even guilty of starting the rebellion or were even to naive or don't care enough to quash the rebellion.  Ever heard of what was started in Bukidnon?  Yup.  Then Bishop Gaudencio Rosales gave the renegade liturgist a haven to start his inculturation brouhaha.  He was not given a place in Manila so he started a School of Liturgy in the mountains!  Just one of those kind of things back in the 70s and 80s.]  He also says that "a flood of documents from the Popes of the 20th century, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) and other Roman Congregations cannot be ignored in the effort to correct trendy theologians who did their part to eliminate the remnants of Western Christendom."  ["And the word was printed on paper...and started gathering dust." so goes a quote in Vatican circles.  Have you ever heard of a study group among seminarians and even among the laity about Evangelium Vitae?  Nah.  How about Redemptionis Sacramentum and Summorum Pontificum among seminarians, liturgists and laity.  Nah.  Only Chupungcan books are discussed.  Bah!]


Liberal, Conservative, or Neither?

Though some observers portray John XXIII as more of a "liberal" and John Paul II as more of a "conservative", all of our experts rejected the categories being applied to them.  [Personally, I have adjectives more apt for both John and John Paul but I'd kept it to myself.  ;)  They are saints.  Let's keep it that way.]

"It's my view that the terms "liberal" and "conservative" are not very helpful or constructive categories for giving an overall assessment of either pope, or any pope, for that matter," [I agree!] Paul Gondrea, professor of moral theology at Providence College, told Aleteia. "These terms are too often overladen with political overtones, or too often mark attempts to fit the Holy Father in a box, to serve in saying something instructive of either Holy Father. And this is because Catholic doctrine itself is neither 'liberal' or 'conservative.'"

He continued: "In truth, as Catholic doctrine itself is much grander than any category we can try and squeeze it in, so too is either Pope John XXIII or Pope John Paul II, whose pontificates at all points sought to uphold Catholic, too large to have a cheap label like 'liberal' or 'conservative' attached to him."

Joseph Pearce, Writer-in-Residence and Professor of Humanities at Thomas More College, agrees. "The terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' are not applicable to either of these popes. Catholics, including popes, are either orthodox or heterodox. Both of these popes were resplendently orthodox and, what is more, practiced the Faith that they preached." [Secret SSPX supporter says...I agree.  But the I am pretty sure some adherents of the SSPX beg to differ.  I guess that priest-blogger who branded me "secret SSPX supporter" and that lawyer who called me "pseudo-Catholic" are they themselves guilty of giving me, as Prof. Gondrea said "cheap labels" to box someone based on his blog posts.  Little do they know that I know more of them than they of me.  But!  But!  I do not brand them as ultra-liberal, defender of the universe...er...the Faith, Knight of the Round Table....er....whatever.  Why can't we just be friends, huh?  What's up with you?  Scared of a little competition called "number of hits", huh?  What am I doing to you?  I do nothing to you, you get mad.  I do something to you, you get mad. What now. I do something, or do nothing or I get mad, huh?   :D]

Esolen points out that both taught the same faith. "Both Popes were profoundly orthodox; on no important doctrinal or moral issue was there a dime's worth of difference between them."
[Honestly, I think that blogger needs some refresher course in Theology.  Seriously.]

Fond Memories

"I remember seeing Pope John Paul II at Madison Square Garden," Zmirak told Aleteia. "Encountering the man helped me shuck off the modernist nonsense my religion teachers had been trying to fill my head with. He was not the ignorant Polish reactionary peasant they taught us about."  [But Modernism is not a nonsense, IMHO.]

Gondreau says he was also impacted by John Paul II as a young man. "I recall being a freshman in highschool when John Paul II was elected pope. There was such excitement and wonder at the election of the first non-Italian pope in centuries. And immediately John Paul II captured the hearts and admiration of the entire world. [Like the euphoria brought by the election of Francis to the See of Peter.] It didn't hurt that he quickly and very ambitiously set out to visit his flock around the globe. There was such great hope and such great optimism. [...] It was palpable even to this American high schooler."

Pearce, a convert to the faith, talks about how John Paul II impacted his new faith: "I first saw him during a general audience in Rome in 1990, only a year or so after my reception into the Church, and was greatly edified by my attendance at World Youth Day in Poland in the following year. I also recall being part of a Corpus Christi procession in Rome in around 1995 and attended World Youth Day in Rome in 2000.

"The last time I saw John Paul II in the flesh was at the canonization of Gianna Beretta Molla and several other saints in 2004. His example during the early years of his papacy, especially in his fight on behalf of those enslaved by the secular fundamentalist regimes in eastern Europe, was very important to my own conversion to Catholicism in 1989. Like so many others, I owe a great deal to JPII."

Wright was encouraged by John Paul II's visits to the US. "I was present during all the World Youth Day festivities in Denver, Co in 1993 which was life changing," he told Aleteia, "yet the Mass Pope John Paul II celebrated on Oct 7th, 1995 at Central Park in New York City was much more intimate. Perhaps it was because I went by myself and not in a group that I felt it was intimate in the midst of 125,000 people.

"He spoke more as a grandfather than as a Pope. He concluded the Mass with these words. 'I say to you today, always be brave. Do not be afraid. Do not be afraid,' Pope John Paul II then said with a slight smile, 'Do not be afraid. God is with you. Do not be afraid to search for God always. Then you will truly be the land of the free and the home of the brave.'"


A Unique Time in Church History?

While Zmirak doesn't dispute the holines of John XXIII or John Paul II, he thinks "the process of canonization was unduly rushed": [Same here!]  "We have had a good run of holy popes. But we are also rushing to judgment, and allowing sentiment to overpower the Church's traditional process of discernment. Here's a good rule: don't canonize anyone (except perhaps a martyr) whom anyone living has fond memories of, and don't let the men a pope appointed handle his canonization cause."  [Fair enough!]

Fr John McCloskey, a Research Fellow of the Faith and Reason Institute in Washington DC, is convinced the Church has been in a special period of her history for Popes. "Speaking as a Church historian, I say with complete confidence that starting with Pope Pius XII up to our present pope we are in the greatest epoch of popes in history above all due to their Holiness."  [Not during Pius IX???]

Esolen goes even further. "We have not had a bad man for Pope since the Council of Trent. We have had plenty of bad presidents, kings, queens, premiers, first citizens, party chairmen, and other addled heads of state, but not one bad Pope in about 500 years."

***

I say this:

Both were noted for their warm personality and holiness, no doubt about it.

Both have their fair share of critics who questioned the way they governed the Church.

Both have their fair share of admirers of how they ushered in a new era into the Church:  John for calling Vatican II, the PASTORAL Council that reshaped the Church, DRAMATICALLY and John Paul, who placed the Church into an ever more influential role in the political and social life of the WHOLE WORLD.

But again, canonizations are about the person's holiness.

A bad tempered person might be martyred for the Faith and he can be canonized, but is he a role model for temperance?  I don't think so.

These two popes may have had issues not resolved or not handled well during their papacies but their holiness, proven by the miracles that happened due to their intercessions, John during his cause for beatification, John Paul, twice; proves that they have received their eternal reward.  They are now enjoying the Beatific Vision, interceding for us to the Father.

May the two popes pray for the cleansing of the Church of the "filth" inflicting Her.

Amen.

Ora pro nobis!




Monday, July 8, 2013

Pro-abortion rallyists heckle pro-lifer with shouts of...

I cannot even type it.

Just go and watch out for what you hear in the background.  :(




Then in this next clip, you'll hear it again in 3:35. By 5:15, they are all shouting it at the same time.




Now you know...

Now start praying this.

PRAYER TO SAINT MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL
St. Michael the Archangel,
defend us in battle.
Be our defense against the wickedness and snares of the Devil.
May God rebuke him, we humbly pray,
and do thou,
O Prince of the heavenly hosts,
by the power of God,
thrust into hell Satan,
and all the evil spirits,
who prowl about the world
seeking the ruin of souls. Amen.