LGBT 'Catholic' Priest part 2

"Father"has decided to clean house and rid his page of anything that could associate him with the damning LGBT community, thanks to our post.

But he still has a few. In short, hindi siya nagbagong buhay, nagbagong bahay lang!

And here are some of his other posts. Napapa iling na lang ako sa kawalan.

LGBT 'Catholic' Priest

What does a Franciscan priest have to do with the LGBT Community?

He supports not only their 'rights', but also the individuals who support it, including FAKE PRIEST Crescencio Agbayani, Jr.

Crescencio is the founder of the LGBTS Christian Church, Inc. which organized FAKE WEDDINGS.

And here, a TRUE PRIEST of the HOLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH supporting this ABOMINATION.

Fr. Robert recently supported an LGBT Flores de Mayo!!! What an insult to the Blessed Virgin Mary!!!

And on his Facebook page, this son of Saint Francis supports anti-Christian sentiments.

What is happening to our priests?

Pray for them. Pray also for more priests.

The irony of those against Paul VI

From Fr. Rolando de la Rosa, OP

***



FORTY-FOUR years ago, Pope Paul VI prophesied the horrible effects of contraception to marriage, family, the individual, and society. It was a Cassandra prophecy: Fated to be right, but never heeded.  [Someone told me before that if we elect the bald one, we would have a problem with contraception.  Guess he was right too!]

In his encyclical Humanae Vitae, Pope Paul VI warned that a contraceptive mentality would lead to the prevalence of divorce, unmitigated premarital sex, the lowering of moral standards among the youth, the phenomenal increase in the number of children born out of wedlock, and rapid decrease of population in countries advocating contraception. He also prophesied that the pervasive use of contraception would diminish our innate sense of responsibility and commitment. Finally, he predicted that contraception would lead to the legalization of abortion.

The Pope’s prophecy is now a reality in many contraceptive-minded countries. Nearly all couples in these countries believe that their marriage is viable only as long as they have no children. The divorce rate is consistently rising. Abortion is so rampant that the disposal of aborted fetus has become a problem. Also, the number of unwed mothers (by choice) has phenomenally increased. With easy access to birth control pills and gadgets, consequence-less sex is now a fad among the youth because it does not entail any responsibility or commitment.  [And the pro-contraception people call the practice of no contraception going back to the Dark Ages!]

Sex without procreation gave way to its corollary: procreation without sex. Sexless procreation is in vogue now: test-tube babies, artificial placentas, surrogate mothers, artificial insemination, etc. Ironically, those countries that aggressively limited the possibility of procreation are now desperately inventing means to procreate even without sex.

Drumbeaters for contraception have recently found another potent way of advertising it: by scaring people with the dangers of AIDS, the doomsday scenario of overpopulation, and linking contraception with women’s reproductive health. [how can it be reproductive when you are preventing reproduction!]

We sometimes regard the attempts of the Church to adapt her life to the exigencies of modern times as a way of compromise, a search for a soft, convenient, and comfortable gospel. Thus, when Humanae Vitae was published, people speculated that it would contain modernized, streamlined, less demanding doctrine on birth regulation. Many hoped that perhaps the Church had reconsidered its traditional stand, and would come up with a more lenient position.

To their dismay, [and a lot of Catholic cardinals, bishops and like-minded modernist theologians!] the Church defied all predictions and reaffirmed instead her traditional teaching on marriage, sex, and the value of human life.

Undoubtedly, Pope Paul VI did not bring peace to many couples. In fact, he destroyed the peace that they cherished – a peace based on the belief that whatever is legal is also moral, or that the easiest and most convenient solution to a problem is the best solution. [I call it: the INSTANT NOODLE solution.  People would rather pour hot water than cook food.  Easy, hassle free.] Humanae Vitae has proven that the Church does not conform to the majority opinion but to the Word of God, and the Pope must proclaim the truth even when it contradicts the current of the times.

***

You may weave the most intricate web of conspiracy theories you may have against Paul VI...

he was also a Mason like Annibale...

...he was drugged for so many years and an actor replaced him...
...he was an apostate who made an apostate Mass...

Call him whatever you want.

Sure he has his flaws in his style of governance.

All popes get that kind of evaluation! Was Bl. John Paul's style of travel everywhere, interview here and there and leave the Vatican to a group of power hungry cardinals who issue their own decrees left and right?

Go and criticize Paul VI.

But one thing is for sure.

He "poped" at the right place and at the right time.

Even if the most liberal, and noisiest cardinals were almost at his neck...

Peter spoke and put his foot forward, and BOOM!

We have Humane Vitae.

The greatest legacy of Paul VI.

And ironically, even the most rabid, sedevacantists praise Paul VI for issuing this great encyclical.

Paul VI is smiling and "whispering" at his tomb at St. Peter's right now:

"Told you so."

Great article from Fr. de la Rosa!

Catholic Relief Services supports contraception!!!

Yet CRS keeps on denying it!

SHAMEFUL!!!!

One hand makes the sign of the cross while the right hand holds a dagger that would treacherously kill.

Shameful!!!!

And it is even more shameful that two Knights of Columbus voted to legislate GAY MARRIAGE in New York.

Shameful for the Supreme Council!!!

You suspend members for not paying their annual dues but not because they support legislation that is against Catholic teaching!!!

SHAME!!!

***

UPDATE: July 24, 2012

Mr. John Rivera, the Director of Communications of Catholic Relief Services posted his comments about this blog post.  He even leads us to the link where they deny involvement with any organization supporting projects that are contrary to the moral teachings of the Church.

Scroll down to the link he sent, and you'll find most if not majority of those who commented will BOYCOTT Catholic Relief Services.

Good!

Pro-life priest Fr. Pavone IS NOT suspended

So says the Vatican!

***

Vatican Upholds Fr. Frank Pavone's Appeal

Priests for Life
6/26/2012

We are happy to announce that the Vatican has upheld Father Frank Pavone's appeal and has declared that Father Pavone is not now nor has ever been suspended. Father Pavone remains a priest in good standing all over the world.

We were confident all along that a just decision would be made by the Vatican's Congregation for the Clergy. While we fully agree that Bishop Zurek has rightful authority over the priests of his diocese, we also see the urgent need for Father Pavone to be allowed to conduct his priestly ministry outside the diocese of Amarillo for the good of the pro-life movement.

With regard to all inquiries relative to Father Pavone's status and the Diocese of Amarillo, we will continue to be as transparent as possible and place all communications and press releases on our public website. In this way we can best respect the rights and privacy of all concerned, particularly ecclesiastical authority and communications which are intended to be confidential at this time.

***

Fr. Pavone was suddenly suspended by Bishop Zurek Patrick J. Zurek of the Diocese of Amarillo, and recalled to his home diocese about somethings the bishop does not even want to fully clarify.

Most in the pro-life circles are wondering why the sudden discipline of the bishop of a priest who is working tirelessly to protect the unborn.

What is most obvious, IMHO, is that the bishop is probably, moooosssttt probably, not in favor of what Fr. Pavone is doing.

Humane Vitae ring a bell to you guys?

Yeah, what the Queen of Looney Tunes, Miriam has been saying that there are priests and bishops who are supportive of the RH Bill, that is true. Heard a lot of whispers in the rectory.

Meanwhile, the angry bishop who just got trumped isn't backing down and issued a very ambiguous statement:

In its decree of May 18, 2012, the Congregation for the Clergy has sustained Father Frank A. Pavone’s appeal of his suspension from ministry outside the Diocese of Amarillo and his appointment from me on October 4, 2011 as Chaplain of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ in Channing, Texas. Father Pavone is to continue his ministry as chaplain until further notice. As a gesture of good will, I will grant permission to him in individual cases, based upon their merits, to participate in pro-life events with the provision that he and I must be in agreement beforehand as to his role and function.  [Gesture of good will....then his permission on an individual case, based upon the merit?!?!?  What?!?!  Going to pro-life events must be based on its merits?!?!  Does the bishop do these to theological dissent festivals?!?!?]

All other matters are outside the purview of this statement.

Amarillo, Texas, June 20, 2012

+Most Rev. Patrick J. Zurek, STL, DD
Bishop of Amarillo

Supreme Knight speaks up against RH Bill!

From CBCP for Life

***

MANILA, April 28, 2012–Pointing out that even the United States is wrestling with the grave consequences of contraception becoming a cultural norm and “reproductive health” being legislated, Supreme Knight Carl A. Anderson of the Knights of Columbus (K of C) explained why things such as contraception, abortion and sterilization finding their way into a government mandate must be rejected.  [the Worthy Supreme Knight knows what he is talking about.]

I remember this photo being taken with the Supreme Knight.  ;)

“[The RH bill] will change the character and nature of the Philippines if it becomes a law. It’s the beginning of the end of the Philippines’ being a truly Catholic country, the Catholic family, Catholic principles,” he said in his remarks to a group of Council chaplains yesterday on the first day of the K of C Philippines 9th National Convention at The Manila Hotel.

Anderson, who was appointed to the Pontifical Academy for Life in 1998 by Blessed John Paul II then to the Pontifical Council for the Laity in 2002, not only reminded but also thanked the Knights in the Philippines for their dedication to uphold a culture of life and encouraged them to cherish a society that values the life of every person with no exceptions.

“People don’t deserve RH bill. People deserve a culture of life, where everyone when they’re born is welcome, where everyone is respected, where everyone is given an opportunity,” he enthused.

“If you don’t respect some people, you don’t recognize the dignity of some… you can’t build a great society on that. You can have material progress, but you can’t build a great culture on that.”

The Supreme Knight — who is also a consultant to the Pro-Life Committee of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) — then expressed the group’s all-out dedication to the efforts to fight the controversial legislative measure pending in the Philippine Congress that will change the country’s family- and life-loving culture if enacted into law.

The religious organization’s efforts in defeating the bill must be top priority, he said, and that “We’re not just competing with wealthy organizations and drug companies. We’re also competing against spiritual powers, so we have to use spiritual weapons. We have to be smart, and we have to fight back smartly. So we’re going to tell the convention tonight, the number one issue for the Knights of Columbus: defeat RH bill.”

The RH bill, which is in the period of interpellation in both the Senate and House of Representatives, has been met with an increasingly strong opposition due to its emphasis on taxpayer-funded contraception, a 6-year sex education program for all schools, and forced participation in RH services health care workers, medical practitioners and employers.

The measure will address the nation’s poverty problem, its proponents and advocates repeatedly claim; [weh?] in addition, poverty continues to be blamed primarily on overpopulation, [people are to be blamed why we are poor, not because some people are just plain damn greedy!] despite studies showing that it is demography – or population distribution – that needs to be addressed. [Most people are in highly urbanized centers like Metro Manila!  Why you might ask?  Because there is no government support in the provinces.  Farmers sell their land in order to get a job in the construction industry in the metropolis.  And so the provinces are emptied and Metro Manila is getting all too cramped!]  Based on this, the “need” to limit the size of the population is inaccurate.

Anderson pointed out an oft-forgotten truth about the wealth that any nation should protect and preserve: “What’s the greatest resource of any country? Its people.”

Many countries are seeing much success in terms of economic progress, he remarked, but partly by destroying the family. “So what will their future be?”  [Look at Europe.]

“The Philippines has a bright future because the Philippines has great people, and as long as the Philippines forms people, preserves marriage, preserves family, this country can ultimately have a great future because it has great people,” he enthused.



Anderson was also optimistic and quietly fervent as he underscored the value of the laity staying united with its priests and bishops. This unity cannot be underestimated; in fact, a lack of it will even pose a stumbling block in the fight for a culture of life, as “the first thing that ‘the other side’ does to weaken the Church is to split the laity from our priests. So we have to maintain that that will never happen to the Knights of Columbus,” he pointed out.  [Not all priests are united with their bishops.  Like priests of MST, SVST?]

“The organization that is number one in defeating the RH bill should be the Knights of Columbus. The only way we can do that is if we remain absolutely, unbreakably united with our priests and bishops,” he added. 


“There may be some organizations that are larger, but there is no organization that gives the Catholic men of our countries the leadership potential, the formation potential, the ability to contribute to the life of the Church, and there is no organization that is more united with its priests and bishops than the Knights of Columbus.”  [Prayer and Action in the Order.]

The Supreme Knight then stressed the role of forming good Catholic men and how this is closely tied to spreading devotion to K of C founder [Venerable] Fr. Michael J. McGivney, whose beatification is avidly being promoted.

“We need to form our men, Catholic men, so they will be good husbands, good fathers, good businessmen, good citizens, and for that we need the help of our priests. For that we need to increase devotion to Fr. McGivney, because as we encourage this devotion, we encourage the understanding of the dedication and commitment of every priest who serves the people of God in his parish,” Anderson enthused.

***

The Supreme Knight delivered an excellent speech in the National Convention.

I hope to post the entire speech in the blog.

The RH Bill is a form of Nazism

New evidence discovered shows Hitler authorized the slaughter of those "who didn't have a right to live. It included mental patients, the disabled and those who couldn't defend themselves".

Isn't it the same thing that doctors who found out about babies they ultrasounded and found out to have physical deformities, would recommend an abortion to their expectant mothers? Isn't the same line that pro-RH people would say that "they better be not born than be born poor, unproductive, disabled, suffering, etc.?"

Who are you to say who has the right to live?

Don't be fooled!

RH is anything but Reproductive nor about Health!

Hitler has come out of the deepest pits of hell!

UN Agencies are the ones pushing Abortion as a "Human Right"

How can you have rights when you are not even allowed to be born?



And you know which UN agencies push the RH Bill here in the Philippines?

Yup, UN agencies like the CEDAW commission and the UNFPA!

A Jesuit's take of the RH Bill

RH Bill vs. Five Levels of Self-Transcendence
Walter Ysaac, S.J.

***

The Reproductive Health (RH) bill is “a mindset and a value system” that are “secularist, materialistic, individualistic and hedonistic in the guise of development and modernity.” Thus, according to the CBCP statement during the “dialogue” meeting last May 10, 2011 (Philippine Star, May 11, 2011, pp.1 and 3), even the good provisions of the Responsible Parenthood (alias RH) bill are “inextricably woven” with the “bad provisions.” Example, it would include authorizing the government buying with taxpayers’ money artificial contraceptives that are already doubtful with regard to being abortifacient or dangerous to health of mother and child and father and to good family relationships, and distributing them upon request to anybody until prohibited by the Food and Drug Administration.  [not all pro-RH people know about this.  Those who know this but continue to promote the RH Bill are either paid hacks by the pharmaceutical companies and/or pro-abortion lobbyists masking as feminists.  Uhm, that's your oxymoron of the day folks!]

But the main defect and danger of the RP (“Responsible” Parenthood) bill is that it is imposed on the people, particularly the poor, by a government without regard for the culture or “world mediated by meanings and motivated by values” of the Filipino people. To really develop and update or “modernize” a people is to make them transcend and sublate themselves from the level of their experience to that of their understanding to that of their judgment to that of their decision up even to the highest level of their unconditional love which is a pure gift of God to us and can only be attained through authentic prayer or truly living relationship with God.  [and yet you have Fr. Bernas who trumps his "freedom to choose" thingy!  Well, of course, for Fr. Bernas the Constitution is more important than the salvation of your immortal soul!]

Now, the experience of the people must start from what they are now in their present culture, their presently accepted meanings and values. [Quite dubious if you ask me.] Anything imposed on them from above will be received according to their own experienced meanings and values which they have understood, affirmed and practiced and unconditionally loved as their own. If the RP bill has, from the start, meanings and values foreign or contrary to theirs, it will be ineffective, (i.e., will not produce the results desired by the bill, namely, reduce population growth), or worse, it will be like an experiment imposed on the throbbing flesh of the Filipino people, causing a lot of suffering and disruption in their lives as a people. Witness what happened to all the other countries who have allowed the imposition of such a mindset and value system to enter into their laws and cultures. [I hope that this line of reasoning is limited to the RH Bill because this line of reasoning of "not being influenced by a foreign culture" is how Vatican II fanatics trump to dissent with what "comes out of Rome".  So you have cases of liturgy that is "not Roman" but "Filipino".  Just saying.]

[I think this is the good part here.]  To have authentic development there is no substitute to self-transcendence (being attentive in experience, intelligent in understanding, reasonable in judgment, responsible in decision and unconditional in love) and sublation (the development from one lower level of living to a higher one will not only not result in any loss of what is good in the lower one but would raise and lift the good in the lower one to the richer level of good of the higher one and so will even need that lower-level good to grow into and become the richer higher-level good).

Thus, if reducing population growth is the end of the RP bill, then it should not impose from above a mindset and value system opposed to the culture of the Filipino people but must start by moving within that culture of the people and go hand in hand with them to develop that culture to more and more attentiveness, intelligence, reasonableness, responsibleness, and finally, to an unconditionalness in love that can transform their responsibleness, reasonableness, intelligence and attentiveness to an even higher (divine) level.


Fr. Walter L. Ysaac, S.J. is a Professor Emeritus of Systematic Theology at the Loyola School of Theology.

***

This is an actual breather if you ask me after the debacle that the Ateneo did when some of its professors expressed support for a Bill that is against Catholic teaching against contraception and after its former president gave a response that would not even qualify as a slap on the wrist.

But I am a bit disappointed in that the Jesuit did not even refer to the Magisterial teaching of the Church against artificial birth control methods.  Instead, he delved upon the cultural impacts of such a Bill that is literally pulled out of the private library of Hillary Clinton and Henry Kissinger!

But, be it as it may, it is still a breather!

Hidden Wording used by Abortion Groups

Hidden Wording used by Abortion Groups
September 9, 2011. (Romereports.com) When talking about health care, wording is key, especially when the words or phrases have double meaning. During MaterCare's International meeting, Dr. Donna Harrison discussed the hidden meaning behind some medical programs.

Dr. Donna Harrison
American Assn. Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (USA)
“For example, 'Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care.' What does that mean? Most of the world wouldn't know, except that Hillary Clinton has mentioned that that involves necessarily abortion.”

Dr. Harrison says part of the problem is that several third world countries are offered an 'all or nothing” approach when it comes to funding.

Dr. Donna Harrison
American Assn. Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (USA)
“This is obscene, this is taking something that is culturally inappropriate for Muslims, Hindus as well as Christians and saying 'you will comply with this or we will not give you development funding.' There is something evil about this funding tyranny.”

On the website of the American Association of Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, there are several studies that deal with the risks mothers face after having an abortion.

Dr. Donna Harrison
American Assn. Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (USA)
“This abortion is not medical care. It cures no disease, it inflicts disease, it inflicts damage on women. This is not good medical care, even from a secular stand point, if you look at the effects of abortion on women, you would have to agree that this does not improve the life of any woman.”

To fight against this, thousands of doctors from different parts of the world are signing up at the Hippocratic Registry website. It's a way to take a stand against laws that promote and even encourage abortions.

***

Isn't this how Angsioco, Claudio, Hontiveros, Garin and Lagman speak of "Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care" ?

Pinoy Bishop tells it like it is

Courtesy of CBCP for Life

***

One of the main reasons, if not the main reason, why the Catholic Church is against the House Bill 4244 (Reproductive Health Bill or Responsible Parenthood Bill) is that the bill directs the government to promote contraception and to give free contraceptives to people. According to Father Bernas, SJ (Sounding Board, Philippine Daily Inquirer, May 23, 2011), this opposition of the Church is against religious freedom. He says that, because of religious freedom, “the state should not prevent people from practicing responsible parenthood according to their beliefs nor may churchmen compel President Aquino, by whatever means, to prevent people from acting according to their religious belief.”

First of all, by opposing the RH Bill, the Catholic Church is not moving for the ban of contraceptives (the non-abortifacient ones), although she would be happy if these contraceptives were banned. At present, in the Philippines, anyone can buy contraceptives from drugstores and even from some “convenience stores”. What the Church is against, I repeat, is that government should promote contraception and provide free contraceptives to people. Therefore it is wrong to say that the Church wants the government to “prevent people from practicing responsible parenthood according to their religious belief” and that the Catholic churchmen are compelling “President Aquino, by whatever means, to prevent people from acting according to their religious beliefs.” What the church does is to try to convince President Aquino and our senators and congressmen not to enact a law that directs the government to promote contraception and provide free contraceptives to people.

It is also good to point out that the church teaching regarding contraceptives is not based on Faith or revelation, although it is confirmed by our Faith. This church teaching is based on natural law, which we know through natural reason. By studying through correct reasoning the nature of the human person, we arrive at this teaching regarding contraception. All human beings, Catholic or not, are obliged to act according to right reason. By the efforts of the Church to go against the RH Bill, the Church is not imposing her religious beliefs on others. She is trying to stop a bill which is against natural law, a law which all human beings, Catholic or not, should follow. The RH Bill, judged from the principles of natural law, is against the good of the human person and the common good. The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in its “Doctrinal Note regarding the Participation of Catholics in Political Life” tells us that all citizens, including Catholics, have the right “to base their contribution to society and political life – through the legitimate means available to everyone in a democracy – on their particular understanding of the human person and the common good.” In a democracy, any group of citizens has the right to campaign and lobby so that what they consider to be good for the country are enacted into law and what they deem to be harmful for the country are not enacted into law.

Father Bernas says further in his column that we live in a pluralist society. This is true and, therefore, we should respect the beliefs and opinions of others. But there is a limit to this pluralism. We cannot accept an “ethical pluralism “which ignores the principles of natural ethics and yield to ephemeral cultural and moral trends, as if every outlook on life were of equal value.” (Doctrinal Note on the Participation of Catholics in Political Life)

Father Bernas also quotes the “Compendum on the Social Teaching of the Catholic Church: “Because of its historical and cultural ties to a nation, a religious community might be given special recognition on the part of the State. Such recognition must in no way create discrimination within the civil or social order for other religious groups” and “Those responsible for government are required to interpret the common good of their country not only according to the guidelines of the majority but also according to the effective good of all the members of the community, including the minority.” The Church, by opposing the HB 4244, is “interpreting the common good of the country not only according to the guidelines of the majority but also according to the effective good of all the members of the community, including the minority.” In opposing the bill the Church is interpreting the common good according to the guidelines of natural law, which is valid for all, the minority as well as the majority. Benedict XVI says that natural law must be the foundation of democracy, so that those in power are not given the chance to determine what is good or evil [Zenit.org. Vatican City, Oct. 5, 2007].

Regarding freedom, Benedict XVI said in his Address to the International Congress on Natural Law: “…yet taking into account that human freedom is always a freedom shared with others, it is clear that the harmony of freedom can be found only in what is common to all: the truth of the human being, the fundamental message of being itself, exactly the “lex naturalis.”




GABRIEL V. REYES, D.D.
Bishop of Antipolo


***

Fr. bernas getting served, big time!

BREAKING!!! Pinoy Catholic parish sponsors RH forum

Really pissed me off, big time!

***

I learned from a friend that rabidly pro-contraception, pro-divorce and "doesn't seem like it but actually she is pro-abortion" politician Risa Hontiveros, (Thank God she lost in the elections.) and rabidly atheist and just like what I said in describing Hontiveros, Dr. Sylvia Claudio have been invited to speak at a pro-RH forum at Sta. Quiteria Parish Church in Baesa, Caloocan City.

I have also learned from my brother knight that the organizers are now frantic to look for a Pro-Lifer to talk to the event, to make it appear that they are sponsoring a "balanced forum"

What is happening to our Church?!?!

Calling Bishop Deogracias Iniguez!  Your own priests are getting out control.

RH supporters rally at a posh hotel

Do you have any idea guys how much that would cost to launch that project?

Who paid for it?

I am sure the fat guy did not shelve out a centavo from her pocket!

Maybe the corrupt old man with a cigar did considering he siphoned off billions when he was in power?

Maybe the has been artists really need attention too after the example of Humpty Dumpty?

Maybe the once pride of the country cannot break into Hollywood like Charice that is why she needed the publicity?

Or maybe Planned Parenthood sent the checks?

Garin needs a dose of her water, right?

Such an idiot!

Pathetic!  Just say it Congresswoman Garin.  We'll do a Piso para Pasig for you and match whatever Planned Parenthood is giving you.

Geez!  And she is a medical doctor and a lawmaker.

If you have doctors and legislators like this, who needs Dr. Kavorkian?

***

PS:  Carlos Celdran said that "people who matter" were at the pro-RH rally, like rich people, celebrities, politicians, media men...

And what about those who do not matter like those he meets at the streets of Tondo who receive the free condoms he gives away?  I thought they are the reason why we need the RH Bill?

Oh, yeah, stoopid me.

People "who don't matter "get killed and aborted!

Right Der Fuhrer?

RH Bill = D.E.A.T.H.

Many thanks to the Colorful Rag for the photo.

The blogger has an excellent blog post about that condom sodomite whore.

WANTED: Attention please!

I promised myself not to make any post for the week but this makes the exception.

***

Sticker protester strikes outside church

President Benigno Aquino’s willingness to risk excommunication to push through a responsible parenthood bill [a misnomer...] has prompted a birth-control advocate to promote the reproductive health (RH) bill outside a church in Manila’s Quiapo district.  [I wish I was there to whack off the smirk out of the face of this sodomite!]

Controversial tour guide Carlos Celdran [sodomite, attention hungry walking tub of lard!  Hopeless case!  Made room reservation at Lucifer's hotel a long time ago!] distributed stickers to motorists outside Quiapo Church yesterday.

“RH [reproductive health bill] Now!” read many of the stickers. 

Retired Lingayen-Dagupan Archbishop Oscar Cruz called Celdran a “big joke.” [Very big joke.  If I were pro-RH, Celdran is my best reason why!]

“I think he’s a big joke because he shows no responsibility, he just says what he likes and he is boundless. He has no beliefs, no values,” the archbishop said.  [Walking filth!]

“I don’t think people take him seriously. Imagine destroying a banner and carrying a placard around a cathedral? What is that?” added Archbishop Cruz.  [Her Facebook friends say that she has more than 34,000 likes.  Yeah Hitler and Mao had more than that.  And you think she has sense?  Bah! Humbug!]

Last year, Celdran disrupted a religious service inside Manila Cathedral by holding up a placard with the word “Damaso,” written on it, referring to a fictitious priest who fathered a child in a novel by national hero Jose Rizal.  [If you read the novel, the real villain is another priest.  Historians corrected him, I mean her on this, because obviously, the lard is a walking idiot!  I can imagine the tour he, I mean she, makes in Intramuros.  Betcha she does not even know the reason why ALL religous orders have churches in Intramuros when they are located a few meters beside each other.]

Last month, Celdran was caught on closed-circuit television removing an anti-RH bill banner from the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines compound in Manila.  [He admitted to his vandalism after he learned that he was caught by a CCTV camera.  Wow!  Really manly.  And his FB fans call him "well-educated and highly respected."  Yeah, IN YOUR DREAMS!]

Archbishop Cruz described Celdran’s stunts as an attempt to grab attention.

“I understand him. I understand his Spanish blood which can probably be traced to Padre Damaso,” he said.  [She has human blood?!?!?  Que Horror!  Que barbaridad]

“I think he is trying to be popular. It’s OK. The poor man is trying to grab attention,” the prelate said.  [Archbishop, it's an IT or a SHE, or whatever.  Not a he. hehehehehehe!]

***


For all I care...

Business is not going well for this joke.

So he needs more attention.

Thank God his program on that god-awful channel is not generating any advertisers.

Serves you right!

Hope her boss who is a sodomite herself loses all the money she has so she can stop taking over businesses left and right.


HEY CELDRAN!  I AM STILL WAITING FOR YOU TO REPLY TO MY CHALLENGE!

IF YOU WANT THE CHURCH TO STOP MEDDLING IN POLITICS...

LET'S PROTEST IN FRONT ON THE INC CENTRAL TEMPLE AND IN THE QUIAPO MOSQUE!

MUSLIMS AND THE INC MEDDLE IN POLITICS TOO!

OR ARE YOU TOO GIRLY TO FACE UP TO THE CHALLENGE!

JUST SAY YES AND I'LL APPROACH YOU WHILE YOU DO YOUR TOUR IN INTRAMUROS.

Mark you calendars again!

THIS IS FREE!

You do not have to pay an extravagant amount for a flimsy meal just to attend like that bird hole for Apostates in Freedom Avenue!  (Go decode that. Ha!)

I always told my friends who have questions about the Faith:

If you are feeling sick, who do you talk to? A physician or a veterinarian?

If you want to know why we make the sign of the cross, who do you talk to? A Catholic who knows why or a rabid Manalo worshipping Iglesia?

If you want answers to your question about the Faith, who do you talk to? A faithful priest, nun or catechist who knows the tenets of the Faith by heart or a liberal pro-contraception, cafeteria Catholic who attacks the Faith in public and ridicules Church authorities pretending to be human rights activist when in fact was just out for a cheap publicity stunt to promote her stupid tour business, pretending to know history?

Poverty goes down when Population goes up

This is from a government bureau.

Now where are those Agents of Death who say that by curbing the population, we help ease poverty.

Huh? Where are you?

Get and share!

Right click on the photo and save!

I saw the "Obey God's Will" banner hanging in front (in the loggia) of St. Peter's Parish Church in Commonwealth Avenue.

Hope other parishes follow suit.

Will we see this hanging in the Church of the Gesu?

I mean the one in Katipunan.

Why a medical doctor is against the RH Bill

Kudos to Dr. Abraham Cruz for writing what is Making a Truly Informed Choice: Why I Am Against the RH Bill. Dr. Cruz graduated his MD from the University of Santo Tomas. He is currently an Instructor, Department of Pharmacology at the Far Eastern University – Dr. Nicanor Reyes Medical Foundation, Institute of Medicine and an
MS Pharmacology Candidate, University of the Philippines Manila – College of Medicine.

If your asking me how good the article is, here is how he starts his article:

While my stand against the RH Bill stems from the initial fact that I am a Catholic first and a physician second, this faith must be enlightened with reason, lest we reduce our faith to natural religiosity, sentimentality, and pious intentions.

And here is how he concludes his article by quoting Dean Tony La Viña of the Ateneo School of Government has said, it is:

“… the love between husband and wife, love for children and family that is the fruit of that love, and ultimately the love of God that forgives us and that enables us to be faithful to the Word in spite of our sinfulness and scarce resources. This is a beautiful message and the Church should not be ashamed of it.”

Since the good dean is from the Ateneo, I am hoping that some of the Jesuits there concur with what he wrote.

Ha!

Another Filipino economist speaks out against the RH Bill

Kudos and thanks to my good friend Carlos Antonio Palad of the Catholic Position on the RH Bill for posting the response of one of the country's imminent economists, Dr. Jesus Estanislao, former Finance Secretary, pictured above

Go on over to the blog to read why this highly-respected economist is against the Bill from Hell.