Pages

Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts

Friday, September 26, 2014

If taken in today's context, I disagree with Ven. Fulton Sheen


With feminists nuns now?  Nah.

But there are those who are still faithful

They wear their habit.
They do not practice New Age spiritualities.
They do not sow disobedience against the Church
They do not support contraception and abortion
They do not support divorce.
They do not support women clergy.

Well, in a nut shell, someone like these two fine women here.


http://mugup.info/appimg/Mother-Teresa/mother-teresa.jpg

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiYJSQHVM-ZqfudxyoSZPVwR1Stxq73RQkbMQ5DPTsqfY36j0_SdhMxfnwHYnqADcYPhgJYJuNA57xt3S50LksfagpjRgJtAtIf0bG229qp2cpLNW2t26StypfO2AII60TKr9bMRsGzHtE/s1600/MotherAngelica.jpg 


Don't be like this nun!


http://pinoyweekly.org/new/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pw-gabriela-mary-john-mananzan.jpg

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

GULP Alert: Priest wannabes

Here is what you get when women start dreaming that they are part of the "royal priesthood" by virtue of their baptism which makes them sharers of Christ's threefold mission of being a "King, PRIEST and Prophet".



The one who posted the photos said that this is not a blessing but a "pre-blessing".  You know like when you prepare beef?  You need to tenderize the meat before you cook it?

That's how you prepare the house.  You need women acting like priests to prepare the house before the MALE priest comes in.

Yes.  You need to balance the forces of the WOMAN's energy, prayer and blessing to come to the house before the MALE prayer and blessing comes in.

Just like this you know...




Continue getting girls to serve at the altar and you get more of these!


Friday, December 27, 2013

Rabid feminists desecrate Christmas Mass..in the name of their right to free speech

WARNING!

This is very graphic.

 

This is how feminists and homosexuals and pro-contraception and pro-abortion activists think and behave.

That in the name of their individuals "rights" they can do whatever they want, to whoever they want to, whenever they want to, most especially offending those who do not share their beliefs.

And top of their list are Catholics who do not strike back.

Like Carlos Celdran and the Filipino Freethinkers aka Freefarters, I dare them do the same stunt in a mosque.  Hey!  Islam is anti-women.

Let's see them do that.



Monday, December 16, 2013

Pope Francis thumbs down Marxism and women cardinals

I am pretty sure their is a very loud groan emanating from St. Vincent School of Theology, Loyola School and Maryhell School of Theology.

***

Vatican City, Dec 15, 2013 / 09:07 am (CNA/EWTN News).- In an interview published Dec. 14 in the Italian newspaper La Stampa, Pope Francis has responded to several questions touching controversial topics that have arisen in his papacy.

When asked by Italian Vatican analyst Andrea Tornielli about the accusations of Marxism from “ultra-conservative Americans,” who took issue with certain passages of the Pope’s recent apostolic exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium, the Pontiff was quick to denounce such ideology.

“The Marxist ideology is wrong,” he responded flatly.

The Pope had severely criticized the assumptions behind “trickle-down theories” in the exhortation, saying that they expressed “a crude and naïve trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacralized workings of the prevailing economic system.”

In blasting economic practices driven by greed and leading to inequality, [hey!  just look at the guys working in Ortigas, Libis, Taguig and Makati!] he drew fire from the likes of radio host Rush Limbaugh, who contended that his comments were “pure Marxism” and “dramatically, embarrassingly, puzzlingly wrong.”

In the new interview, Pope Francis said he wasn’t offended by the comments, noting that he has known many Marxists who were still “good people.”

The Pope reaffirmed his adherence to the constant tradition of the Church, explaining that he had no intention of speaking in technical language.

“In the exhortation, there is nothing that is not found in the Social Doctrine of the Church. I didn't speak from a technical point of view, I tried to present a photograph of what happens,” he said.  [Maybe he is just being a Jesuit, you know.]

“The only specific citation was for the ‘trickle-down’ theories, according to which every economic growth, supported by the free market, is able to produce in itself a great equity and social inclusion,” he continued.

Sunday’s interview contained continued criticism of these specific ideas. “There was the promise that when the glass was full, it would have flowed over and the poor would have benefited from it. Instead, what happens is that when it is full the glass magically gets larger, and so nothing ever comes out for the poor.”  [The Church teaches that even when the glass is not full, give some to the poor.]

But “this was the only reference to a specific theory,” he repeated.

Pope Francis took the opportunity to re-emphasize his standpoint, stressing, “I repeat, I do not speak as a technician, but according to the Social Doctrine of the Church. And this does not mean being Marxist.”

When asked about another controversial topic, the possibility of women cardinals, the Pontiff was quick to point to the problematic assumption underlying the question. “Women in the Church must be valued, not ‘clericalized.’ Whoever is thinking (about) women cardinals suffers a bit from clericalism.”  [Toinks!  The Mass itself is being to clericalized and yet these very same liturgists claim that they are against clericalization so they think of ways of clericalizing the laity, aka active participation.  Can we clap for Fr. Genaro Diwa???]

As for any rumors about his own consideration of the issue, “It is a line that has come from who knows where,” he said.

Tornielli’s questions also included the recently much-discussed topic of communion for divorced and remarried Catholics. Unless their first marriage has been annulled, the Church prohibits the reception of the Eucharist by these individuals, because they are living with someone other than their legitimate spouse.

“The exclusion from communion for divorced persons who live (in) a second union is not a sanction. It’s good to remember that,” replied Pope Francis.

“We must seek to facilitate people’s faith rather than control it,” he added.

Evangelii Gaudium had noted the need for both “prudence” and “boldness” in regards to the sacraments, saying “everyone can share in some way in the life of the Church; everyone can be part of the community, nor should the doors of the sacraments be closed for simply any reason.”

Pope Francis explained in the latest interview, however, “some (people) had immediately thought of the sacraments for the divorced and remarried, but I did not speak about particular cases: I wanted only to indicate a principle.”

The interview, which spanned three pages, also included the Pope’s thoughts on ecumenical matters and his concern for the poor, as well as his understanding of Christmas as “a meeting with Jesus” in which “the hope and the tenderness of the Birth of the Lord shakes us out of indifference.”

***

The entire interview of Andrea Tornielli can be read here.

After that...

Go spread the word and go ruin the day of an angry feminist nun who has an issue with his father and any father-figure or male authority like this bunch!



Did you know that this Marxist, anti-Church, pro-abortion pro-divorce group was founded by this "catholic" nun?

"Sr." Mary John Mananzan, proud Foundress of Gabriela

No women cardinal, Tita!

Go get another life.

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Feminists groups are for the respect of other people's rights....

Yeah.........right.........

This is making it's round in Facebook.


Scantily clad activists of feminist group Femen invaded a conference at a university in Brussels. During the act, demonstrators threw water on the Archbishop of Mechelen-Brussels, Andre-Joseph Leonard. The priest did not react and avoided looking at the activists. The protest was against homophobia, according to international agencies. At the end of the demonstration, the archbishop kissed a picture of the Virgin Mary to leave the room. Born in Ukraine and with subsidiaries in several countries (including Brazil and nations with a Muslim majority), the Femen often campaigning for the rights of women and minorities. One of their banners is the defense of gay marriage.
***

More pictures here.

The actual dousing



The archbishop like a lamb to be slain, sits silently, looking like he was praying, while the attacks and insults continue.

As you can see from the pictures, the "women" doused the archbishop with water from a plastic bottle that looked like the image of Our Lady of Lourdes.  It must Lourdes water they used.  If it were, bit of class for a barbaric horde, don't you think?

Here the archbishop kissed the bottle before leaving the seminar.



The same archbishop had been humiliated many times in public by these "rights" group.  The archbishop was just telling like it is.

The attitudes of active homosexuals is a perversion.  Period. And for that the archbishop got pied.

These "women" are not 'scantily' clad.  They are naked at the top.

And why do these "women" and other angry feminists turn their attention only at the Catholic Church and not against this group which also opposes gay marriage and worst, does not give women even the basic of civic rights like voting...


Well, these angry women like Gabriela cannot find anything in the Koran that says anything like "love your enemies" or "turn the other cheek".  In the Bible, it does.

So, you get these group fighting for respect of rights insulting someone in public.

A Catholic archbishop to be exact.

Satan is busy at work.

Pray.


PS:  I use the quotation marks when I refer to these "women" as such because the word is not applicable to them.  The word woman was given such an honor by the Lord in the Gospels, I shirk when I imagine calling or using the word on these "women".  My wife, my mom, my relatives and friends who are WOMEN, are so honorable and dignified they don't deserve to be called the same things as these well, HARLOTS OF THE DEVIL.

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Dissenting nun must be shown her proper place!



Yes, that is the arrogant declaration of a pro-RH Maryknoll Nun named "Sr" Nenita Tapia of Miriam College, who is happily angry at the Catholic Church.

Look at her!



Here's how she puts it:

She believes the RH Bill provides free access to reproductive health services
-  But she wittingly dodged the issue that this involves artificial birth control methods!  When you talk to angry nuns like these the next question you get is "But the Philippines is not entirely Catholic!"  Yes, but are you still one?  What this so-called advocated think is that they forget that they are Catholics and possess a title "Sr." and "MM" for Maryknoll Missionary that not all Catholics possess.  She causes grave scandal for someone of her identity and stature to publicly albeit implicitly declare her support for artificial birth control methods.

She believes that RH is for the poor.
- What a way to single out the poor, no?  Admitting that the poor need RH simply means that a.) the government admitted how incompetent it is and b.) the poor are helpless to educate so they need artificial contraception or they keep multiplying!  Wow!  For a nun like you, that is unbelievable.  Fortunately, there are Catholic institutions and nuns to be exact who work to educate the poor on how to plan their families without using artificial contraception.  They EDUCATE because they see hope in people, including poor people.  They do not find the easy way out just like this dissident nun!  Ever heard of the late great pro-life champ, Sr. Pilar Versoza?

She is a Roman Catholic nun who believes in the primacy of conscience that transcends all religions.
- Yeah, she is a Roman Catholic......MY FOOT!  Conscience takes its primacy only and only if that conscience is well informed, educated and formed!  Her conscience is a biased one, filthied by her angry feminist views!  Catholic teaching states that artificial contraception is a big no-no and while she may probably know about this, her feminist conscience pushes the radical feminist agenda to justify the need to use artificial contraception and reasons out that it is based on her conscience!  You think Hitler and Mussolini did not tell themselves that they used their conscience to push their agenda?  CONSCIENCE MY FOOT!


Well, I guess she hates this book, too.  DUH!

She urges the legislators to use their conscience to help their constituents who are poor.
-  She thinks the congressmen don't go around to find what goes on in their constituencies.  Yeah, she knows better.  Typical angry nun.

"When we die we will face our God not our bishops."
- Who says we will face our bishops?  Where the heck did she get this idea?  But all dissident Catholics would definitely face the bishops, well, if the bishops do their job.  We all follow the commandments of God, from the Pope to the laity.  No exemptions.  Who does she think she is?  Queen Elizabeth???

"Now who is your God, the punishing God or the loving God?"
- BOTH! God is a loving God but God will also "come to judge the world by fire".  He will say to those who did not heed His voice "Depart from me you accursed ones!"  I think she uses bible of those who despise anything that which is written in the actual Bible.

If you still doubt whether this nun is just for RH and not for abortion, where here is your final proof!


Can you see the one on the right?  Yes that is so-called RH advocate, when in fact ABORTION PROMOTER AND PROVIDER, Junice Melgar, MD of abortion group Likhaan, which I still wonder why is not being prosecuted.

This is one MS. TAPIA I am not laughing with.

This one, though grumpy in character is funnier.



The old one needs to have either get a formal excommunication or get the biological solution.

Unless the bishops act fast, and in this case, the ever so slow Bishop Honesto Ongtioco, we will see more dissidents from Katipunan Ave. in his own diocese reek out more trash from their devilish forked tongues!

No wonder the exorcism prayer of St. Benedict is phrased this way. "Begone Satan! Never tempt me with your vanities! What you offer me is evil. Drink the poison yourself!"

RH advocates promise you the heavens when in fact it is a short-trip to perversion and hell!

These types of nuns who think they live in Europe and the USA, who think that by changing that which is divinely revealed or that even nature itself set, is teaching us progress and development, must be disciplined IMMEDIATELY.

Well, I guess we can't expect much with Bishop Ongtioco....unless he actually does something!


PS:  Miriam College has more filth than what you have actually heard.  Stay tuned for more updates here at TPC as we unravel these dissident "c"atholic institutions and how some bishops would rather be fence sitters and watch how their sheep gets devoured by ravening wolves.

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Angry Nuns protest coal power plant.

From UCANews.

***

Hundreds of nuns have criticized a decision by their city council that paves the way for the construction of a coal-fired power plant in Mindanao. [HUNDREDS?!?!?!]



Sister Elvie Solemino  [SISTER?!?!  Is that you?!?!  No not the one with shades.]  said today that she and around 200 members of the Association of Consecrated Women in Davao archdiocese have signed a petition demanding authorities reconsider their decision to reclassify land where Aboitiz Power Corp plans to build a 150 megawatt coal-fired power plant.

Sister Solemino said the decision was made without a proper environmental impact study and that the association will personally deliver copies to City Hall in a public demonstration of their opposition.  [And I am sure the group of nuns did, because that is what they do.  Profess vows to protect the environment....]

Davao city council last week granted the firm’s application for the land to be reclassified [Now that is fishy.] from medium industrial to heavy industrial so it can be used to locate the power plant.

Sister Solemino said the city’s decision “dismayed” the nuns because it allows Aboitiz to “disrespect the sanctity of God’s creation.”  [Uhm....]

City officials who voted in favor “disregarded the cries of the people,” she said.  [The cries of the WOMYN.]

The power company says it wants to build the plant in Davao to help augment Mindanao’s power supply.  [True if you ask me.  Mindanao power sucks!  Power outages are so common, you'd be surprised you have power!]

It says Mindanao’s heavy reliance on hydro-electric power has seriously eroded power supply reliability since it is highly vulnerable to extreme weather conditions.

“Generating power with the use of coal will significantly reduce dependence on hydro power,” the company explained.  [But it is dirty.  And Aboitiz is dirtier!]

Nonetheless, the nuns and other groups opposed to the plant have branded the city council’s decision to approve land reclassification as reckless.  [Go to the courts!  Not the streets!  Oh, yeah.  I think they don't have the evidence.]

***

The title of this post paints a picture in my mind.

You know, like the famous video game.

Ha!

You know, most of the times, it is not really about caring for the environment that these WOMYM are out in the streets fighting for these issues.  Most of the time, it is rooted on ECO-FEMINISM and NEO-PAGANISM.

Ugh!

God in the creation stuff.  Ugh!

But on the other hand, it is a good thing that some groups fight for the protection of the environment, no?

The ends justify the means?

Friday, October 28, 2011

Jay Leno's wife: Koran is more liberal to women than the Bible



And it is not even part of the routine of Jay Leno on the Tonight Show.

Taken from the Examiner.

***
When asked about the role of Islam in the status of women in Afghanistan, Leno confirmed that “the Quran is more liberal with women than the Bible.” She added that Prophet Mohammad was married to a wealthy and powerful woman, implying that Islam has nothing against empowering women; on the contrary it is a religion that supports women’s rights. Culture, on the other hand, affects the interpretation of religious texts which results in assaulting women’s rights.
***

She thinks she is funny.

No, she was dead serious when she said it.

If she thinks that women in Islam are treated well, then why in 1999, the Leno couple, donated $100,000 to Feminist Majority Foundation's Campaign to Stop Gender Apartheid in Afghanistan, a feminist organization Mrs. Leno supports since 1997 to further the cause of educating the public about the plight of Afghan women under the Taliban. So the Taliban was punishing Afghan women based on what?  Just pure gender issue and no influence from their religion?  Bin Laden was waging terror and mass murder on the world based on....?

No wonder we have these...




And they are not because of the book.

Wonder what drove them to do these to women?

Maybe, according to Mrs. Leno, the Bible has this.

Right. Because real feminists would be quick to bash Catholicism and Christianity and be coy and politically correct when it comes to Islam and Muslims.

Right, Beth Angsioco and Sylvia Claudio?

And It thought these women are women of courage.

Piffle!

By the way, the Leno couple do not have children and do not want to adopt.  But Jay Leno has 100 cars and more than 90 rare motorcycles.  He even has a website dedicated for it.  What "doting parents" they are, eh?

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

FLIMSY EXCUSE FOR NOT WEARING THE RELIGIOUS HABIT

from UCANews.com

***

YANGON (UCAN) -- A decision by a congregation of nuns to dress in civilian clothes almost a decade ago is still not fully accepted by laypeople in Myanmar.

The Sisters of Our Lady of the Missions, [or RNDM, the first letters of the congregation in French since they are a French congregation] who mostly work in Pyay diocese, decided to discard their habit in favor of the traditional Myanmar longyi (sarong) and blouse in 2000 to better integrate with the people they serve. [better integrate?  what? you need to dress like the people to better integrate with them?  so if the sisters work in Papua New or among the aborigines of Australia... you get the picture. that is such a flimsy excuse to escape the religious habit.  I will tell you more of the story of why these sisters don't wear the habit later.]

However, their decision to wear civilian clothing is still being viewed with mixed feelings by laypeople. [hell yeah.]

Mary Ann, 65, a parishioner of St. Francis Church in Pyay diocese, said, "Although youths can accept them as nuns without the habit... I still want them to dress like nuns as they are not ordinary people. They are people who have dedicated themselves to God." [Dress like nuns!  Not ordinary people!  Dedicated themselves to God!  HAH!  It came from a lay woman! BUT obviously these sisters see themselves differently.]

Geraldine Zin Mar Lwin, 40, a laywoman from St. Paul's Parish, also in Pyay diocese, agreed. "We don't want them to dress like ordinary people as they are Religious." She conceded though that it is more practical to wear civilian dress as "the weather is very hot and humid throughout the year." [Do you dress the habit so you can be comfortable?  Tell that to the Marines!  No litereally.  Look at your soldiers, policemen, doctors and nurses.  When they go to their work, they wear their uniforms...to...BE IDENTIFIED IN PUBLIC.  Why be shy of who you are in your state of life?  They do not complain of wearing their uniforms.  They are PROUD of what their uniforms stand for.  They do not complain of the heat or humidity.  These are flimsy excuses.  The religious uniform aka HABIT is your public identification of WHO YOU ARE in the world. It is a public witness.] 

However, U Aung Kywe, 52, said that "by their good example and loving service, the majority of the people in Pyay diocese now accept them as nuns even though they wear civilian clothing." [That is beside the point.  Good or bad nuns must wear the habit, as called for by Vatican II. "The religious habit, an outward mark of consecration to God, should be simple and modest, poor and at the same becoming. In addition it must meet the requirements of health and be suited to the circumstances of time and place and to the needs of the ministry involved." (Perfectae Caritatis - Decree on the Adaptation and Renewal of Religious Life – 17).]

Explaining her congregation's decision, Sister Noreen Htun, 62, said that wearing local dress helps nuns integrate better with people, and makes it easier for the nuns to "approach them and work with them." [Integrate?  Meaning people will have a hard time relating to you because you are wearing a religious habit?  Did they conduct a study that proves that people are more comfortable talking to habit-less sisters than those with the habits? Rubbish.  I find this another flimsy excuse.  Why?  My own personal exprience...I stumbled upon a priest...in civilian clothes...walking in the mall...with a young...Never mind.  Imagine if he were wearing his cassock or a clerical collar, would he have that much freedom to move around and do what he wants?  Cannot "integrate" easily, eh?]

In 1986, she started to wear a brown longyi and the traditional long-sleeve blouse while still wearing her veil. She said that when she "attended formation courses in Bangladesh and India," she saw nuns from her own congregation "wearing their own cultural dress." [The longyi is radically different from the sari of the sisters of Mother Teresa.  They too wear a traditional dress of the Indians but they have a veil and they resemble the habit of Latin rite Catholics.  The longyi is different!]

Four years later, the longyi became the norm in her congregation, except for nuns over 60 years of age. [NO!  I say it again, NO!  Why I knew RNDM sisters here in the Philippines and they ARE NOT wearing the longyi.  I'll prove this later.]

Another nun, Sister Rita Phyo recounted an incident in 1998 when they went to work in Rakhine State, where most of the people are Muslims. "At that time we were still using veils and some people thought we were Muslim women," she recalled. Soon, local superiors decided to do away with the veil "and from 2000 all our nuns began wearing the local civilian clothing -- longyi and blouse," she said. [So what if you are considered Muslim women?  Quite frankly it is beneficial.  I knew some missionary sisters in Mindanao, the Southern part of the Philippines, where majority of Muslim Filipinos live.  The sisters said that Muslims respect nuns because of the veil which resembles the veil (or hijab) of Muslim women.  Women who cover their heads are more respectful in the eyes of Muslim men since this practice is prescribed by the Qur'an.  So this is more of an asset rather than a liability.  Again another flimsy excuse that does not hold water.]

The only item which distinguishes them as nuns is a cross they wear around their necks. [Which they designed themselves.  This is how their "cross" looks like .  Looks like more of a Christmas card Star of Bethlehem to me.] 


However, the change to civilian dress was not without problems. Sister Christine May, 40, recalled how five years ago when they attended a religious course in Yangon, nuns from another congregation thought they were postulants. "Not only laypeople but also nuns treated us differently," she remarked. [What do you expect?  You brought this on you.]

Father David Ba Thein, 55, director of Pyay diocese's Karuna Social Service agency said local priests prefer the nuns to wear their veils, at least during Mass. [Like all women back in the days.  It still can be done since NOT ONE SINGLE CHURCH DOCUMENT says that it is forbidden for women to wear veils or mantillas during Mass.] In his view, priests "can distinguish who they are" when they wear their "uniforms." [Exactly as I said earlier!]

 
Mother Euphrasie Barbier [that's her below.  Lovely isn't she?  Notice her crucifix?  Now that's a crucifix.] founded the Sisters of Our Lady of the Missions in 1861 in Lyons, France. The nuns came to Myanmar in 1887. Most worked in mission schools but after the government's nationalization policy in 1962, they began helping priests in parish work, especially in Pyay diocese.


They also began poultry farms, fisheries and vegetable plantations to support their work among orphans and poor rural children, run student hostels, and work with youth and women.

They care for HIV/AIDS patients together with nuns from St. Joseph Congregation and look after leprosy patients in collaboration with the Baptists. [That's how they got their look?  From the Baptists?  Just joking...] They also care for displaced children near the border with Thailand. 

There are presently 64 nuns in 12 convents in Pyay and one each in Yangon archdiocese and Mawlamyine diocese. Worldwide, there are more than 1,000 nuns. Many in other countries also wear civilian dress.

***

The picture above is the General Council's Meeting of the Sisters.  Notice how each has her own habit.  Not the same longyi as claimed by the sister in the interview.  The sister in the middle is Sr. Maureen McBride, RNDM, the superior general of the sisters.  She was once assigned here in the Philippines along with other sisters.  They were not wearing the longyi or any cultural dress.  They were wearing plain civilian clothes.  She was my former professor in college.  Very nice woman though.  Strong-willed woman.  I remember one time in class when my classmate said that she met this "girl", Sr. Maureen suddenly got agitated.  She does not want us to use the word girl.  It must be "woman" or womyn?  She even gave a different interpretation of the Announciation.  Really distorted.  Classic 60s era feminism.  

She said that their order discarded the habit and veil because:

1)It is the call of Vatican 2(?!)

2) so they can better integrate(?!)

3) the veil is a symbol of submissiveness to the male dominated society (?!)

Radical Feminism in the Church...you know where it is headed... Click here.